Literature DB >> 15865980

Preparation of samples for comparative studies of arthropod chromosomes: visualization, in situ hybridization, and genome size estimation.

Rob DeSalle1, T Ryan Gregory, J Spencer Johnston.   

Abstract

The ability to obtain large amounts of genomic sequence for organisms and high throughput technology has led to a change in the thrust of research at the level of chromosomes in animals. In the past chromosomal analysis of animals was focused on gross changes such as inversions, translocations, and deletions for both genetic and evolutionary studies. The advent of in situ hybridization technology and the ability to measure genome content size changed both the precision and the scale of studies addressing chromosomal change as a tool in evolutionary biology. This chapter addresses two of the major areas of change that have occurred in chromosomal studies in the past decade -- examination of more refined and genome enabled structural changes in chromosomes and genome size measure. This chapter describes some of the chromosome structure approaches such as fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and other techniques. As well, advances in Genome size measurement and theory are described herein.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15865980     DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)95025-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  13 in total

1.  Extremely small genomes in two unrelated dipteran insects with shared early developmental traits.

Authors:  Urs Schmidt-Ott; Ab Matteen Rafiqi; Klaus Sander; J Spencer Johnston
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  New genome size estimates of 134 species of arthropods.

Authors:  Shawn Jason Hanrahan; J Spencer Johnston
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Genome of Rhodnius prolixus, an insect vector of Chagas disease, reveals unique adaptations to hematophagy and parasite infection.

Authors:  Rafael D Mesquita; Raquel J Vionette-Amaral; Carl Lowenberger; Rolando Rivera-Pomar; Fernando A Monteiro; Patrick Minx; John Spieth; A Bernardo Carvalho; Francisco Panzera; Daniel Lawson; André Q Torres; Jose M C Ribeiro; Marcos H F Sorgine; Robert M Waterhouse; Michael J Montague; Fernando Abad-Franch; Michele Alves-Bezerra; Laurence R Amaral; Helena M Araujo; Ricardo N Araujo; L Aravind; Georgia C Atella; Patricia Azambuja; Mateus Berni; Paula R Bittencourt-Cunha; Gloria R C Braz; Gustavo Calderón-Fernández; Claudia M A Carareto; Mikkel B Christensen; Igor R Costa; Samara G Costa; Marilvia Dansa; Carlos R O Daumas-Filho; Iron F De-Paula; Felipe A Dias; George Dimopoulos; Scott J Emrich; Natalia Esponda-Behrens; Patricia Fampa; Rita D Fernandez-Medina; Rodrigo N da Fonseca; Marcio Fontenele; Catrina Fronick; Lucinda A Fulton; Ana Caroline Gandara; Eloi S Garcia; Fernando A Genta; Gloria I Giraldo-Calderón; Bruno Gomes; Katia C Gondim; Adriana Granzotto; Alessandra A Guarneri; Roderic Guigó; Myriam Harry; Daniel S T Hughes; Willy Jablonka; Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly; M Patricia Juárez; Leonardo B Koerich; Angela B Lange; José Manuel Latorre-Estivalis; Andrés Lavore; Gena G Lawrence; Cristiano Lazoski; Claudio R Lazzari; Raphael R Lopes; Marcelo G Lorenzo; Magda D Lugon; David Majerowicz; Paula L Marcet; Marco Mariotti; Hatisaburo Masuda; Karine Megy; Ana C A Melo; Fanis Missirlis; Theo Mota; Fernando G Noriega; Marcela Nouzova; Rodrigo D Nunes; Raquel L L Oliveira; Gilbert Oliveira-Silveira; Sheila Ons; Ian Orchard; Lucia Pagola; Gabriela O Paiva-Silva; Agustina Pascual; Marcio G Pavan; Nicolás Pedrini; Alexandre A Peixoto; Marcos H Pereira; Andrew Pike; Carla Polycarpo; Francisco Prosdocimi; Rodrigo Ribeiro-Rodrigues; Hugh M Robertson; Ana Paula Salerno; Didier Salmon; Didac Santesmasses; Renata Schama; Eloy S Seabra-Junior; Livia Silva-Cardoso; Mario A C Silva-Neto; Matheus Souza-Gomes; Marcos Sterkel; Mabel L Taracena; Marta Tojo; Zhijian Jake Tu; Jose M C Tubio; Raul Ursic-Bedoya; Thiago M Venancio; Ana Beatriz Walter-Nuno; Derek Wilson; Wesley C Warren; Richard K Wilson; Erwin Huebner; Ellen M Dotson; Pedro L Oliveira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Convergent evolution of neural systems in ctenophores.

Authors:  Leonid L Moroz
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  The nuclear genome of the phytoseiid Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) is among the smallest known in arthropods.

Authors:  Ayyamperumal Jeyaprakash; Marjorie A Hoy
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Flow cytometry and K-mer analysis estimates of the genome sizes of Bemisia tabaci B and Q (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae).

Authors:  Li T Guo; Shao L Wang; Qing J Wu; Xu G Zhou; Wen Xie; You J Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Hybridization and polyploidy enable genomic plasticity without sex in the most devastating plant-parasitic nematodes.

Authors:  Romain Blanc-Mathieu; Laetitia Perfus-Barbeoch; Jean-Marc Aury; Martine Da Rocha; Jérôme Gouzy; Erika Sallet; Cristina Martin-Jimenez; Marc Bailly-Bechet; Philippe Castagnone-Sereno; Jean-François Flot; Djampa K Kozlowski; Julie Cazareth; Arnaud Couloux; Corinne Da Silva; Julie Guy; Yu-Jin Kim-Jo; Corinne Rancurel; Thomas Schiex; Pierre Abad; Patrick Wincker; Etienne G J Danchin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Genomic Features of the Damselfly Calopteryx splendens Representing a Sister Clade to Most Insect Orders.

Authors:  Panagiotis Ioannidis; Felipe A Simao; Robert M Waterhouse; Mosè Manni; Mathieu Seppey; Hugh M Robertson; Bernhard Misof; Oliver Niehuis; Evgeny M Zdobnov
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Estimation of the genome sizes of the chigger mites Leptotrombidium pallidum and Leptotrombidium scutellare based on quantitative PCR and k-mer analysis.

Authors:  Ju Hyeon Kim; Jong Yul Roh; Deok Ho Kwon; Young Ho Kim; Kyungjae A Yoon; Seungil Yoo; Seung-Jae Noh; Junhyung Park; E-Hyun Shin; Mi-Yeoun Park; Si Hyeock Lee
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  The determinants of genetic diversity in butterflies.

Authors:  Alexander Mackintosh; Dominik R Laetsch; Alexander Hayward; Brian Charlesworth; Martin Waterfall; Roger Vila; Konrad Lohse
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.