Literature DB >> 15864700

The current status of perioperative chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: a multiinstitutional retrospective study in Japan.

Yoshiyuki Matsui1, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Jun Watanabe, Satoshi Teramukai, Yoshinari Ono, Shinichi Ohshima, Kiyohide Fujimoto, Yoshihiko Hirao, Masanori Fukushima, Osamu Ogawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a multiinstitutional analysis to clarify the clinical significance of perioperative chemotherapy, in invasive bladder cancers in Japan, and to identify the patient subpopulations who could benefit from perioperative chemotherapy.
METHODS: A total of 913 consecutive patients aged less than 80 years who underwent radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer from 1990 to 2000 at 32 Japanese hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Median follow-up was 3.8 years (range, 0.1 to 11.8 years).
RESULTS: In total, 341 patients (37.3%) were treated with perioperative chemotherapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 174), adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 114), or a combination of both chemotherapies (n = 53). With cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy, the MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimen was the one most frequently used for perioperative chemotherapy, but the average number of cycles was distinctly less than that in reported randomized trials. MEC (methotrexate, epirubicin, and cisplatin) chemotherapy had efficacy similar to that of the MVAC regimen. On analysis of patients stratified by stage, the overall survival of patients with adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly better than that of those without adjuvant chemotherapy, in patients with pT2b, pN0 or pT3, pN0 (P = 0.016 or 0.020, respectively), but adjuvant chemotherapy had no, or the opposite, effect on patients with pT2a, pN0, pT4, pN0, or pTany, pN+. On the other hand, neoadjuvant chemotherapy provided a statistically significant survival benefit only for patients with clinical T3N0 (P = 0.015). Of note, in the high-risk subgroup, the overall survival rate for patients with complete response (CR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly better than that of patients with partial response (PR) or no change (NC)/progressive disease (PD) (P = 0.043).
CONCLUSION: In Japan, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy has been the main modality adopted perioperatively for high-risk patients with radical cystectomy. This study's clinical results indicated that perioperative chemotherapy may improve survival in patients with T3N0 or pT2b/pT3, pN0 bladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864700     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-004-0474-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  8 in total

1.  Bladder-preserving therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: should it be recommended to appropriate patients?

Authors:  Hideyuki Akaza
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Co-expression of ERCC1 and Snail is a prognostic but not predictive factor of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Atsunari Kawashima; Hitoshi Takayama; Norihiko Kawamura; Noriteru Doi; Mototaka Sato; Koji Hatano; Akira Nagahara; Motohide Uemura; Yasutomo Nakai; Kensaku Nishimura; Susumu Miyoshi; Kiyoshi Kawano; Kazuo Nishimura; Norio Nonomura; Akira Tsujimura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 3.  p53 and chemosensitivity in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nishiyama; Jun Watanabe; Osamu Ogawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Pooled analysis of clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant cisplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Bertram E Yuh; Nora Ruel; Timothy G Wilson; Nicholas Vogelzang; Sumanta K Pal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced urothelial carcinomas: the Ehime University Hospital experience.

Authors:  Akira Ozawa; Nozomu Tanji; Tatsumasa Ochi; Yutaka Yanagihara; Tadahiko Kikugawa; Akiko Yamaguchi; Tetsuhiro Ikeda; Kenji Shimamoto; Katsunori Aoki; Akihiko Toshino; Masayoshi Yokoyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Role of gemcitabine and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer: Experience over the last decade.

Authors:  Sunny Goel; Rahul J Sinha; Ved Bhaskar; Ruchir Aeron; Ashish Sharma; Vishwajeet Singh
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-06-25

7.  Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Manifestating as Malignant Lymphoma with Generalized Lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Venkat Pavan Kancharla; Frederick A Gulmi; Aref Agheli; Michael Degen; Arash Gohari; Ming Jiang; J C Wang
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2010-04-30

8.  Tolerability and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with a Tri-Weekly Interval Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, and Cisplatin Regimen for Patients with Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Satoko Arai; Tomohiko Hara; Yoshiyuki Matsui; Keiichi Koido; Hironobu Hashimoto; Yasuo Shinoda; Motokiyo Komiyama; Hiroyuki Fujimoto; Hiroyuki Terakado
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2018-07-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.