Literature DB >> 15863486

Chevron behavior and isostable enthalpic barriers in protein folding: successes and limitations of simple Gō-like modeling.

Hüseyin Kaya1, Zhirong Liu, Hue Sun Chan.   

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that a "near-Levinthal" cooperative mechanism, whereby the common Gō interaction scheme is augmented by an extra favorability for the native state as a whole, can lead to apparent two-state folding/unfolding kinetics over a broad range of native stabilities in lattice models of proteins. Here such a mechanism is shown to be generalizable to a simplified continuum (off-lattice) Langevin dynamics model with a Calpha protein chain representation, with the resulting chevron plots exhibiting an extended quasilinear regime reminiscent of that of apparent two-state real proteins. Similarly high degrees of cooperativity are possible in Gō-like continuum models with rudimentary pairwise desolvation barriers as well. In these models, cooperativity increases with increasing desolvation barrier height, suggesting strongly that two-state-like folding/unfolding kinetics would be achievable when the pairwise desolvation barrier becomes sufficiently high. Besides cooperativity, another generic folding property of interest that has emerged from published experiments on several apparent two-state proteins is that their folding relaxation under constant native stability (isostability) conditions is essentially Arrhenius, entailing high intrinsic enthalpic folding barriers of approximately 17-30 kcal/mol. Based on a new analysis of published data on barnase, here we propose that a similar property should also apply to a certain class of non-two-state proteins that fold with chevron rollovers. However, several continuum Gō-like constructs considered here fail to predict any significant intrinsic enthalpic folding barrier under isostability conditions; thus the physical origin of such barriers in real proteins remains to be elucidated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15863486      PMCID: PMC1366551          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.057471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  77 in total

1.  Three-helix-bundle protein in a Ramachandran model.

Authors:  A Irbäck; F Sjunnesson; S Wallin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Polymer principles of protein calorimetric two-state cooperativity.

Authors:  H Kaya; H S Chan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-09-01

Review 3.  How do small single-domain proteins fold?

Authors:  S E Jackson
Journal:  Fold Des       Date:  1998

4.  The pressure dependence of hydrophobic interactions is consistent with the observed pressure denaturation of proteins.

Authors:  G Hummer; S Garde; A E García; M E Paulaitis; L R Pratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Protein folding in the landscape perspective: chevron plots and non-Arrhenius kinetics.

Authors:  H S Chan; K A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-01

6.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins.

Authors:  K W Plaxco; K T Simons; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-04-10       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Cooperativity in protein folding: from lattice models with sidechains to real proteins.

Authors:  D K Klimov; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Fold Des       Date:  1998

8.  Folding intermediates of wild-type and mutants of barnase. I. Use of phi-value analysis and m-values to probe the cooperative nature of the folding pre-equilibrium.

Authors:  P A Dalby; M Oliveberg; A R Fersht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-02-27       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Titration properties and thermodynamics of the transition state for folding: comparison of two-state and multi-state folding pathways.

Authors:  Y J Tan; M Oliveberg; A R Fersht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-11-29       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Global analysis of the effects of temperature and denaturant on the folding and unfolding kinetics of the N-terminal domain of the protein L9.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D L Luisi; P A Evans; D P Raleigh
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-12-18       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  9 in total

1.  Cooperativity and the origins of rapid, single-exponential kinetics in protein folding.

Authors:  Patrícia F N Faísca; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Testing simplified proteins models of the hPin1 WW domain.

Authors:  Fabio Cecconi; Carlo Guardiani; Roberto Livi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Effects of surface tethering on protein folding mechanisms.

Authors:  Miriam Friedel; Andrij Baumketner; Joan-Emma Shea
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Excluded volume, local structural cooperativity, and the polymer physics of protein folding rates.

Authors:  Xianghong Qi; John J Portman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Enthalpic barriers dominate the folding and unfolding of the human Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase monomer.

Authors:  Can Kayatekin; Noah R Cohen; C Robert Matthews
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Distinguishing between cooperative and unimodal downhill protein folding.

Authors:  Fang Huang; Satoshi Sato; Timothy D Sharpe; Liming Ying; Alan R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Native contact density and nonnative hydrophobic effects in the folding of bacterial immunity proteins.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  Insights from coarse-grained Gō models for protein folding and dynamics.

Authors:  Ronald D Hills; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  Discrete kinetic models from funneled energy landscape simulations.

Authors:  Nicholas P Schafer; Ryan M B Hoffman; Anat Burger; Patricio O Craig; Elizabeth A Komives; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.