Literature DB >> 15863469

Reproductive allocation of biomass and nitrogen in annual and perennial Lesquerella crops.

E L Ploschuk1, G A Slafer, D A Ravetta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The use of perennial crops could contribute to increase agricultural sustainability. However, almost all of the major grain crops are herbaceous annuals and opportunities to replace them with more long-lived perennials have been poorly explored. This follows the presumption that the perennial life cycle is associated with a lower potential yield, due to a reduced allocation of biomass to grains. The hypothesis was tested that allocation to perpetuation organs in the perennial L. mendocina would not be directly related to a lower allocation to seeds. *
METHODS: Two field experiments were carried on with the annual Lesquerella fendleri and the iteroparous perennial L. mendocina, two promising oil-seed crops for low-productivity environments, subjected to different water and nitrogen availability. * KEY
RESULTS: Seed biomass allocation was similar for both species, and unresponsive to water and nitrogen availability. Greater root and vegetative shoot allocation in the perennial was counterbalanced by a lower allocation to other reproductive structures compared with the annual Lesquerella. Allometric relationships revealed that allocation differences between the annual and the perennial increased linearly with plant size. The general allocation patterns for nitrogen did not differ from those of biomass. However, nitrogen concentrations were higher in the vegetative shoot and root of L. mendocina than of L. fendleri but remained stable in seeds of both species. *
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that vegetative organs are more hierarchically important sinks in L. mendocina than in the annual L. fendleri, but without disadvantages in seed hierarchy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15863469      PMCID: PMC4246817          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  4 in total

1.  Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants.

Authors:  J S Coleman; K D McConnaughay; D D Ackerly
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis: a quantitative approach.

Authors:  F W Penning de Vries; A H Brunsting; H H van Laar
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Phenological responses to temperature of an annual and a perennial Lesquerella species.

Authors:  Liliana B Windauer; Gustavo A Slafer; Damian A Ravetta
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants: Negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants.

Authors:  P F Scholander; E D Bradstreet; E A Hemmingsen; H T Hammel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Allocation of biomass and photoassimilates in juvenile plants of six Patagonian species in response to five water supply regimes.

Authors:  Lucrecia Cella Pizarro; Alejandro J Bisigato
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Missing domesticated plant forms: can artificial selection fill the gap?

Authors:  David L Van Tassel; Lee R DeHaan; Thomas S Cox
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 3.  Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought.

Authors:  Louise H Comas; Steven R Becker; Von Mark V Cruz; Patrick F Byrne; David A Dierig
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Linking Changes to Intraspecific Trait Diversity to Community Functional Diversity and Biomass in Response to Snow and Nitrogen Addition Within an Inner Mongolian Grassland.

Authors:  Wei Mao; Andrew J Felton; Tonghui Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 5.753

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.