Literature DB >> 15861068

Tissue-engineered flexible ear-shaped cartilage.

Jian-Wei Xu1, T Shane Johnson, Pejman M Motarjem, Giuseppe M Peretti, Mark A Randolph, Michael J Yaremchuk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous attempts to engineer human ear-shaped constructs mimicked human shape but lacked the flexibility and size of a human ear. Recently, the authors engineered flexible cartilage by incorporating a perichondrium-like layer into the construct. In this study, they used lyophilized swine perichondrium as a pseudoperichondrium, examined its ability to confer flexibility to tissue-engineered cartilage, and used it to engineer flexible cartilage in the shape and size of a human ear.
METHODS: Auricular chondrocytes and perichondrium were isolated from swine. Chondrocytes were mixed with fibrin polymer and gelled to form 5 x 20-mm constructs. Constructs alone (control, n = 6) or constructs sandwiched between two layers of lyophilized swine perichondrium (experimental, n = 6) were implanted into athymic mice. Auricular chondrocytes in fibrin polymer and lyophilized perichondrium were also used to form a tri-layer, ear-shaped construct, which was implanted into an athymic rat and externally stented for 6 weeks (n = 1). At 12 weeks, constructs were analyzed with histology and gross mechanical testing.
RESULTS: New cartilaginous tissue was engineered in both the experimental and control groups. In samples laminated with lyophilized swine perichondrium, the intimate integration of the laminate with the neocartilage closely resembled the histoarchitecture of the native swine ear. Experimental constructs had mechanical properties similar to those of the native swine ear, while control constructs fractured with similar testing. The engineered ear could not be fractured with gross mechanical testing, and its size, shape, and flexibility remained stable.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that it is possible to engineer a cartilage construct that resembles the human ear not only in shape but also in size and flexibility. This study also confirms that lamination is a reliable method to confer elastic-like flexibility to an engineered cartilage construct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15861068     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000161465.21513.5d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  12 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of human and porcine auricular cartilage.

Authors:  David A Zopf; Colleen L Flanagan; Hassan B Nasser; Anna G Mitsak; Farhan S Huq; Vishnu Rajendran; Glenn E Green; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 2.  Auricular reconstruction via 3D bioprinting strategies: An update.

Authors:  Ruby Dwivedi; Pradeep Kumar Yadav; Rahul Pandey; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-08-02

3.  Shaped, stratified, scaffold-free grafts for articular cartilage defects.

Authors:  EunHee Han; Won C Bae; Nancy D Hsieh-Bonassera; Van W Wong; Barbara L Schumacher; Simon Görtz; Koichi Masuda; William D Bugbee; Robert L Sah
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Auricular reconstruction from rib to 3D printing.

Authors:  Chelsea L Reighard; Scott J Hollister; David A Zopf
Journal:  J 3D Print Med       Date:  2017-12-15

5.  Ear-Shaped Stable Auricular Cartilage Engineered from Extensively Expanded Chondrocytes in an Immunocompetent Experimental Animal Model.

Authors:  Irina Pomerantseva; David A Bichara; Alan Tseng; Michael J Cronce; Thomas M Cervantes; Anya M Kimura; Craig M Neville; Nick Roscioli; Joseph P Vacanti; Mark A Randolph; Cathryn A Sundback
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Tissue engineering of human ear pinna.

Authors:  Nilesh Bhamare; Kishor Tardalkar; Archana Khadilkar; Pratima Parulekar; Meghnad G Joshi
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.752

7.  Biocompatibility of Subcutaneously Implanted Plant-Derived Cellulose Biomaterials.

Authors:  Daniel J Modulevsky; Charles M Cuerrier; Andrew E Pelling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Auricle shaping using 3D printing and autologous diced cartilage.

Authors:  Junlin Liao; Yong Chen; Jia Chen; Bin He; Li Qian; Jiaqin Xu; Aijun Wang; Qingfeng Li; Hongju Xie; Jianda Zhou
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Chondrogenic potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on a novel, auricular-shaped, nanocomposite scaffold.

Authors:  Kavi H Patel; Leila Nayyer; Alexander M Seifalian
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 7.813

Review 10.  Protein and Polysaccharide-Based Magnetic Composite Materials for Medical Applications.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Bealer; Kyril Kavetsky; Sierra Dutko; Samuel Lofland; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.