Literature DB >> 15860854

Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as primary medical therapy in women with breast cancer: an anglo-celtic cooperative oncology group study.

T R Jeffry Evans1, Ann Yellowlees, Elizabeth Foster, Helena Earl, David A Cameron, Andrew W Hutcheon, Robert E Coleman, Timothy Perren, Christopher J Gallagher, Mary Quigley, John Crown, Alison L Jones, Martin Highley, Robert C F Leonard, Janine L Mansi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE To compare the clinical and pathologic response rates of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) with doxorubicin and docetaxel (AD) as primary chemotherapy in women with primary or locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with histologically proven breast cancer with primary tumors >/= 3 cm, inflammatory or locally advanced disease, and no evidence of metastases were randomly assigned to receive a maximum of six cycles of either doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks or doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) IV every 3 weeks, followed by surgery on completion of chemotherapy. Results A total of 363 patients were randomly assigned to AC (n = 180) or AD (n = 183). A complete clinical response was observed in 17% and 20% of patients treated with AC and AD, respectively (P = .42). Overall (complete and partial) clinical response rates for AC and AD were 61% and 70%, respectively (P = .06). There was no significant difference in either the pathologic complete response rates in the breast with AC (24%) and AD (21%; P = .61) or in the number of patients with positive axillary nodes at surgery with AC (61%) and AD (66%; P = .28). At a median follow-up of 32 months, there is no significant difference between the two groups for the number of relapses. CONCLUSION In contrast to the positive results reported for sequential docetaxel after AC as primary chemotherapy of breast cancer, our data do not suggest a benefit for simultaneous AD over AC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15860854     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  48 in total

Review 1.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Preoperative concurrent paclitaxel-radiation in locally advanced breast cancer: pathologic response correlates with five-year overall survival.

Authors:  Sylvia Adams; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Martin Donach; Darcy Spicer; Stella Lymberis; Baljit Singh; Joshua A Bauer; Tsivia Hochman; Judith D Goldberg; Franco Muggia; Robert J Schneider; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Silvia C Formenti
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Utility of DNA postreplication repair protein Rad6B in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Malathy P V Shekhar; Laura A Biernat; Nat Pernick; Larry Tait; Judith Abrams; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Phase I/II study of G3139 (Bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide) in combination with doxorubicin and docetaxel in breast cancer.

Authors:  Stacy L Moulder; W Fraser Symmans; Daniel J Booser; Timothy L Madden; Cindy Lipsanen; Linda Yuan; Abenaa M Brewster; Massimo Cristofanilli; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; James Zwiebel; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Prospective phase II study of neoadjuvant doxorubicin followed by cisplatin/docetaxel in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Taher A Al-Tweigeri; Dahish S Ajarim; Adher A Alsayed; Mohamed M Rahal; Mohamed O Alshabanah; Asma M Tulbah; Osama A Al-Malik; Doha M Fatani; Gamal A El-Husseiny; Naser B Elkum; Adnan A Ezzat
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline.

Authors:  S Gandhi; G G Fletcher; A Eisen; M Mates; O C Freedman; S F Dent; M E Trudeau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  A Canadian national expert consensus on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: linking practice to evidence and beyond.

Authors:  C E Simmons; S Hogeveen; R Leonard; Y Rajmohan; D Han; A Wong; J Lee; M Brackstone; J F Boileau; R Dinniwell; S Gandhi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Time interval of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery in breast cancer: how long is acceptable?

Authors:  Tae-Kyung Yoo; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

9.  Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast cancer: Focus on chemotherapy and biological targeted treatments' armamentarium.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papadimitriou; Konstantinos Papademetriou; Alexandros Ardavanis; Panteleimon Kountourakis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for "triple negative" breast cancer: a review of current practice and future outlook.

Authors:  Zeina Nahleh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.