AIMS: To study the diagnostic value of a new 2D left ventricle hypertrophy (2D LVH) score in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in comparison with the conventional maximal wall thickness (MWT) measurement (>13 mm in adults), which is limited by a low sensitivity in relatives. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was performed in 237 adults from genotyped families with HCM. Population A (derivation sample) comprised 109 adults and population B (validation sample) comprised 128 adults. MWT and 2D LVH scores (sum of thicknesses of four segments) were determined by echocardiography. Genotyping was the gold standard for diagnosis. In population A, a theoretical value for LVH score was determined in the healthy population by a multiple linear regression model including age, sex, and body surface area. An abnormal cut-off value was defined as an LVH score above a maximum theoretical value according to receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 73 and 96% for 2D LVH score and 62.5 and 100% for MWT. Improvement of sensitivity was particularly important in adults <50 years of age (69 vs. 54%, respectively, P<0.04). These results were validated in population B: sensitivity and specificity of LVH score were, respectively, 75 and 96% in this sample and 67 and 97%, in the subgroup <50 years. In the latter, sensitivity of LVH score increased when compared with that of MWT (67 vs. 53%, P<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The LVH score has a higher diagnostic value for HCM than the conventional criterion of MWT, particularly in young adults. This echographic parameter may be proposed as an alternative diagnostic criterion for familial screening.
AIMS: To study the diagnostic value of a new 2D left ventricle hypertrophy (2D LVH) score in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in comparison with the conventional maximal wall thickness (MWT) measurement (>13 mm in adults), which is limited by a low sensitivity in relatives. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was performed in 237 adults from genotyped families with HCM. Population A (derivation sample) comprised 109 adults and population B (validation sample) comprised 128 adults. MWT and 2D LVH scores (sum of thicknesses of four segments) were determined by echocardiography. Genotyping was the gold standard for diagnosis. In population A, a theoretical value for LVH score was determined in the healthy population by a multiple linear regression model including age, sex, and body surface area. An abnormal cut-off value was defined as an LVH score above a maximum theoretical value according to receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 73 and 96% for 2D LVH score and 62.5 and 100% for MWT. Improvement of sensitivity was particularly important in adults <50 years of age (69 vs. 54%, respectively, P<0.04). These results were validated in population B: sensitivity and specificity of LVH score were, respectively, 75 and 96% in this sample and 67 and 97%, in the subgroup <50 years. In the latter, sensitivity of LVH score increased when compared with that of MWT (67 vs. 53%, P<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The LVH score has a higher diagnostic value for HCM than the conventional criterion of MWT, particularly in young adults. This echographic parameter may be proposed as an alternative diagnostic criterion for familial screening.
Authors: Catherine M McGorrian; Sarah Lyster; Andrew Roy; Heloise Tarrant; Mary Codd; Peter Doran; Maria Fitzgibbon; Joseph Galvin; Niall G Mahon Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 2.298