Lam P Ly1, Peter Y Liu, David J Handelsman. 1. Departments of Andrology, Concord Hospital & ANZAC Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2139, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Practical hormonal male contraceptive regimens are likely to have delayed onset and offset of reliable contraception dictated by the length of the spermatogenic cycle and clearance rate of pre-formed sperm from the ductular system. While delayed onset of contraceptive efficacy is an accepted feature of vasectomy, reliable time estimates for a hormonal male contraceptive of time to onset and offset of reliable contraception and of resumption of normal male fertility are required. METHODS AND RESULTS: We utilized the sperm output data from three male contraceptive efficacy studies to define quantitative estimates of suppression and recovery rates from an androgen alone (testosterone enanthate) and an androgen/progestin (testosterone/depot medroxyprogesterone acetate) study. Using nearly 14,000 semen samples from World Health Organization (WHO) studies #85921 and #89903 with identical protocols, the rate of suppression of sperm output was best modelled as a two-parameter, single exponential decay function with effective half-time to suppression of 5.5 weeks and times of 6.8 weeks to 10 x 10(6)/ml, 8.7 weeks to 5 x 10(6)/ml, 10.0 weeks to 3 x 10(6)/ml and 13.0 weeks to 1 x 10(6)/ml. The rate of recovery using absolute sperm concentration was best modelled as a three-parameter, sigmoidal curve with effective time to reach half of the recovery plateau of 10.5 weeks and times of 9.0 weeks to 3 x 10(6)/ml, 9.9 weeks to 5 x 10(6)/ml, 11.5 weeks to 10 x 10(6)/ml, and 13.6 weeks to 20 x 10(6)/ml. Using relative sperm output, defined as a percentage of the participants' own baseline, recovery approached an asymptotic plateau of approximately 85% of geometric mean pre-treatment sperm concentration. In the combination androgen/progestin study, suppression rate was significantly faster (effective time to reach half maximal suppression of 3.0 weeks) and recovery significantly slower (effective time to reach half of recovery plateau of 14.7 weeks) and less complete (asymptotic recovery plateau of 43% of baseline) than in the androgen-alone WHO studies. CONCLUSION: These findings therefore provide large sample estimates of the suppression and recovery rates from an androgen-alone hormonal male contraceptive regimen as a basis for comparison with other second-generation combination androgen/progestin regimens that are the most promising approach to developing practical male hormonal regimens.
BACKGROUND: Practical hormonal male contraceptive regimens are likely to have delayed onset and offset of reliable contraception dictated by the length of the spermatogenic cycle and clearance rate of pre-formed sperm from the ductular system. While delayed onset of contraceptive efficacy is an accepted feature of vasectomy, reliable time estimates for a hormonal male contraceptive of time to onset and offset of reliable contraception and of resumption of normal male fertility are required. METHODS AND RESULTS: We utilized the sperm output data from three male contraceptive efficacy studies to define quantitative estimates of suppression and recovery rates from an androgen alone (testosterone enanthate) and an androgen/progestin (testosterone/depot medroxyprogesterone acetate) study. Using nearly 14,000 semen samples from World Health Organization (WHO) studies #85921 and #89903 with identical protocols, the rate of suppression of sperm output was best modelled as a two-parameter, single exponential decay function with effective half-time to suppression of 5.5 weeks and times of 6.8 weeks to 10 x 10(6)/ml, 8.7 weeks to 5 x 10(6)/ml, 10.0 weeks to 3 x 10(6)/ml and 13.0 weeks to 1 x 10(6)/ml. The rate of recovery using absolute sperm concentration was best modelled as a three-parameter, sigmoidal curve with effective time to reach half of the recovery plateau of 10.5 weeks and times of 9.0 weeks to 3 x 10(6)/ml, 9.9 weeks to 5 x 10(6)/ml, 11.5 weeks to 10 x 10(6)/ml, and 13.6 weeks to 20 x 10(6)/ml. Using relative sperm output, defined as a percentage of the participants' own baseline, recovery approached an asymptotic plateau of approximately 85% of geometric mean pre-treatment sperm concentration. In the combination androgen/progestin study, suppression rate was significantly faster (effective time to reach half maximal suppression of 3.0 weeks) and recovery significantly slower (effective time to reach half of recovery plateau of 14.7 weeks) and less complete (asymptotic recovery plateau of 43% of baseline) than in the androgen-alone WHO studies. CONCLUSION: These findings therefore provide large sample estimates of the suppression and recovery rates from an androgen-alone hormonal male contraceptive regimen as a basis for comparison with other second-generation combination androgen/progestin regimens that are the most promising approach to developing practical male hormonal regimens.
Authors: Taylor P Kohn; Matthew R Louis; Stephen M Pickett; Mark C Lindgren; Jaden R Kohn; Alexander W Pastuszak; Larry I Lipshultz Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: M Y Roth; J J S Nya-Ngatchou; K Lin; S T Page; B D Anawalt; A M Matsumoto; B T Marck; W J Bremner; J K Amory Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Arthi Thirumalai; Jonas Ceponis; John K Amory; Ronald Swerdloff; Vijaya Surampudi; Peter Y Liu; William J Bremner; Eric Harvey; Diana L Blithe; Min S Lee; Laura Hull; Christina Wang; Stephanie T Page Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Peter Y Liu; Ronald S Swerdloff; Bradley D Anawalt; Richard A Anderson; William J Bremner; Joerg Elliesen; Yi-Qun Gu; Wendy M Kersemaekers; Robert I McLachlan; M Cristina Meriggiola; Eberhard Nieschlag; Regine Sitruk-Ware; Kirsten Vogelsong; Xing-Hai Wang; Frederick C W Wu; Michael Zitzmann; David J Handelsman; Christina Wang Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-02-26 Impact factor: 5.958