Literature DB >> 15860387

Secondary prevention after cryptogenic cerebrovascular events in patients with patent foramen ovale.

Herwig Walter Schuchlenz1, Wolfgang Weihs, Andrea Berghold, Anita Lechner, Reinhold Schmidt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke are at risk of recurrence, but there are few data on strategies to prevent this.
METHODS: We studied 280 consecutive patients with cryptogenic cerebrovascular events and a patent foramen ovale examined by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. Patients received platelet inhibitors (n = 66) or anticoagulation (n = 47) or underwent device closure (n = 167). During the mean follow-up of 2.6 years, we compared the frequency of recurrent events, death and severe treatment complications.
RESULTS: A total of 33 (12%) patients had a recurrent cerebrovascular event. The annual recurrence rates were 13% in patients treated with platelet inhibitors, 5.6% in those on oral anticoagulation, and 0.6% in those after device closure. Independent predictors of recurrent cerebrovascular events were a patent foramen ovale larger than 4 mm (hazard ratio 3.8, 95% CI 1.2-11.2; p = 0.017) or previous strokes (hazard ratio 4.3, 95% CI 2.0-9.2; p < 0.001). Interventional closure of the patent foramen ovale decreased the risk of a recurrent event compared with oral anticoagulation (hazard ratio 0.06, 95% CI 0.12-0.29; p < 0.001), whereas antiplatelet therapy showed a trend to an increased risk (hazard ratio 2.3; 95% CI 0.9-5.5; p = 0.055). Major side effects occurred in 7 anticoagulated patients and in 13 patients after device closure. There were two non-vascular deaths and one fatal hemorrhagic stroke.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a large patent foramen ovale and a cryptogenic cerebrovascular event had a substantial risk of recurrence even with medical treatment. Risk of recurrence was lower after device closure of the patent foramen ovale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15860387     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  20 in total

1.  Patent foramen ovale and stroke: Should PFOs be closed in otherwise cryptogenic stroke?

Authors:  David A Carpenter; Andria L Ford; Jin-Moo Lee
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Patent foramen ovale closure and medical treatments for secondary stroke prevention: a systematic review of observational and randomized evidence.

Authors:  Georgios D Kitsios; Issa J Dahabreh; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; David E Thaler; David M Kent
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  PFO Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: Review of New Data and Results.

Authors:  Shyam Rao; Cathy Sila
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-06

4.  Patent foramen ovale closure for patients with cryptogenic stroke: A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials and 14 observational studies.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Shi-Dong Chen; Yi Dong; Qiang Dong
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 5.243

5.  Sustained risk of recurrent thromboembolic events in patients with patent foramen ovale and paradoxical embolism: long-term follow-up over more than 15 years.

Authors:  Dieter Fischer; Ajmal Gardiwal; Jonas Haentjes; Gunnar Klein; Gerd-Peter Meyer; Helmut Drexler; Dirk Hausmann; Arnd Schaefer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  [Homonymous visual field defect in established migraine with aura].

Authors:  M Kynigopoulos; A Tzamalis; T Schlote
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 7.  Anticoagulant vs. antiplatelet therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  David M Kent; Issa J Dahabreh; Robin Ruthazer; Anthony J Furlan; Christian Weimar; Joaquín Serena; Bernhard Meier; Heinrich P Mattle; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Maurizio Paciaroni; Herwig Schuchlenz; Shunichi Homma; Jennifer S Lutz; David E Thaler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Decrease in shunt volume in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Christian Tanislav; Manfred Kaps; Marek Jauss; Erwin Stolz; Wolfgang Pabst; Max Nedelmann; Mathias Grebe; Frank Reichenberger; Jens Allendoerfer
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 9.  Secondary stroke prevention: patent foramen ovale, aortic plaque, and carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Bernhard Meier; Benedikt Frank; Andreas Wahl; Hans C Diener
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Migraineurs with patent foramen ovale have larger right-to-left shunt despite similar atrial septal characteristics.

Authors:  Jill T Jesurum; Cindy J Fuller; Carles A Velez; Merrill P Spencer; Kimberly A Krabill; William H Likosky; William A Gray; John V Olsen; Mark Reisman
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 7.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.