Literature DB >> 15857190

DNA-based genetic testing is rising steeply in a national health care system with open access to services: a survey of genetic test use in Germany, 1996-2002.

Jörg Schmidtke1, Brigitte Pabst, Irmgard Nippert.   

Abstract

The extent to which the fast-growing body of genetic knowledge is transferred into everyday clinical practice has nowhere been assessed in a systematic way. Available quantitative analyses of DNA-based genetic test provision and uptake rates are all concerned with specific test programs. The German health-care system is ideally suited for a more general approach, because it is highly flexible regarding access to services, thus permitting quick adjustments to sudden changes in particular subfields of medicine such as genetic testing. We have measured the amount of genetic service provision in Germany between 1996 and 2002 by making use of the central database of the German national health-care system and by inquiring with private health insurance. We can document a three-fold increase of DNA-based testing in the time period 1996-2002, whereas cytogenetic analyses and genetic counseling have remained constant. The growing body of genetic knowledge does indeed seem to be transferred into medical practice at an increasing rate, and the uptake rates are largely in proportion to test offers. DNA-based testing appears to be focussed on disease-associated germ-line alterations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15857190     DOI: 10.1089/gte.2005.9.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  7 in total

1.  Points to consider in assessing and appraising predictive genetic tests.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Jürgen John; Helena Kääriäinen; Alastair Kent; Ulf Kristofferson; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-10-16

Review 2.  Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Criteria for fairly allocating scarce health-care resources to genetic tests: which matter most?

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Jörg Schmidtke; Georg Marckmann
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Genetic education and the challenge of genomic medicine: development of core competences to support preparation of health professionals in Europe.

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Celine Lewis; Alastair Kent; Domenico A Coviello
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments.

Authors:  Franziska Severin; Jörg Schmidtke; Axel Mühlbacher; Wolf H Rogowski
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Cancer risk communication, predictive testing and management in France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK: general practitioners' and breast surgeons' current practice and preferred practice responsibilities.

Authors:  Irmgard Nippert; Claire Julian-Reynier; Hilary Harris; Gareth Evans; Christi J van Asperen; Aad Tibben; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-12-03

7.  Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness.

Authors:  Franziska Severin; Pascal Borry; Martina C Cornel; Norman Daniels; Florence Fellmann; Shirley Victoria Hodgson; Heidi C Howard; Jürgen John; Helena Kääriäinen; Hülya Kayserili; Alastair Kent; Florian Koerber; Ulf Kristoffersson; Mark Kroese; Celine Lewis; Georg Marckmann; Peter Meyer; Arne Pfeufer; Jörg Schmidtke; Heather Skirton; Lisbeth Tranebjærg; Wolf H Rogowski
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.246

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.