Literature DB >> 15856663

Tattooing, body piercing, and permanent cosmetics: a historical and current view of state regulations, with continuing concerns.

Myrna L Armstrong1.   

Abstract

The popularity of tattooing, body piercing, and permanent cosmetics demands up-to-date state legislation. The objective of this article is to present a historical perspective and nationwide review of current state regulations for body art. Methods comprised Internet and telephone inquiries to state agencies. It was found that while 36 states have changed their body art legislation since 1998, the overall strength of the regulations varies widely. The author concludes that it is unrealistic, given the amount of body art performed in the United States, to prohibit body art, emphasize only business licensing, or have limited state regulations while local municipalities establish separate policies. Concerns remain about standard precautions, adequate documentation of complications, and lack of uniform regulations. Quality protection will mean taking a more comprehensive approach to effective regulations and enforcement.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15856663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health        ISSN: 0022-0892            Impact factor:   1.179


  3 in total

1.  Causes and recommendations for unanticipated ink retention following tattoo removal treatment.

Authors:  William Kirby; Cynthia L Chen; Alpesh Desai; Tejas Desai
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2013-07

Review 2.  Transmission of hepatitis C virus infection through tattooing and piercing: a critical review.

Authors:  Rania A Tohme; Scott D Holmberg
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Beauty Or Health? A Personal View.

Authors:  Haliza Mohd Riji
Journal:  Malays Fam Physician       Date:  2006-04-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.