Literature DB >> 15855038

The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.

Anu Sharma1, Michael F Dorman, Andrej Kral.   

Abstract

We examined the longitudinal development of the cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) in 21 children who were fitted with unilateral cochlear implants and in two children who were fitted with bilateral cochlear implants either before age 3.5 years or after age 7 years. The age cut-offs (<3.5 years for early-implanted and >7 years for late-implanted) were based on the sensitive period for central auditory development described in [Ear Hear. 23 (6), 532.] Our results showed a fundamentally different pattern of development of CAEP morphology and P1 cortical response latency for early- and late-implanted children. Early-implanted children and one child who received bilateral implants by age 3.5 years showed rapid development in CAEP waveform morphology and P1 latency. Late-implanted children showed aberrant waveform morphology and significantly slower decreases in P1 latency postimplantation. In the case of a child who received his first implant by age 3.5 years and his second implant after age 7 years, CAEP responses elicited by the second implant were similar to late-implanted children. Our results are consistent with animal models of central auditory development after implantation and confirm the presence of a relatively brief sensitive period for central auditory development in young children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15855038     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  114 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity in the developing auditory cortex: evidence from children with sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Garrett Cardon; Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Cochlear implants and brain stem implants.

Authors:  Richard T Ramsden
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Speech recognition performance in children with cochlear implants using bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  S B Rathna Kumar; P Mohanty; S G R Prakash
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-05

4.  The influence of a sensitive period for auditory-visual integration in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Phillip M Gilley; Anu Sharma; Teresa V Mitchell; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Early unilateral cochlear implantation promotes mature cortical asymmetries in adolescents who are deaf.

Authors:  Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness: A New Treatment Paradigm.

Authors:  Daniel M Zeitler; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-04

Review 7.  [Early hearing experience and sensitive developmental periods].

Authors:  A Kral
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Short-term results of Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened children.

Authors:  Ozgul Akin Senkal; Evren Hizal; Haluk Yavuz; Ismail Yilmaz; Levent Naci Ozluoglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Infant cortical electrophysiology and perception of vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Barbara K Cone
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Vibrant Soundbridge® in preschool children with unilateral aural atresia: acceptance and benefit.

Authors:  M Leinung; E Zaretsky; B P Lange; V Hoffmann; T Stöver; C Hey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.