Literature DB >> 15854934

Late outcome after stenting or coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: a single-center matched-propensity controlled cohort study.

Ron T van Domburg1, Johanna J M Takkenberg, Leo J Noordzij, Francesco Saia, Lex A van Herwerden, Patrick W J C Serruys, Ad J J C Bogers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although several randomized controlled trials examined the relative benefits of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the most appropriate treatment remains a matter of debate, at least in some subsets of patients. Therefore, we evaluated the 8-year outcome after multivessel stent implantation (stent group) or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG group) in a single-center propensity-matched cohort study.
METHODS: The stent study population consisted of all 409 consecutive patients who underwent an elective coronary intervention between 1995 and 1999 in whom at least 2 stents were implanted in multiple vessels. They were matched by using the propensity score method with 409 CABG patients of 1,723 CABG patients with multivessel disease who underwent elective CABG in the same period of time. The two populations were very different before matching. After matching, the CABG population resembled a stent population.
RESULTS: The cumulative survival rates after stent were 93%, 90%, and 82% at, respectively, 3, 5, and 8 years; and after CABG 97%, 93%, and 87% (p = 0.02). This was caused mainly by patients with left main disease (p = 0.03). Event-free survival was only 70%, 68%, and 64% after stent and 89%, 82%, and 78% after CABG at, respectively, 3, 5, and 8 years (p < 0.0001). After adjusting, stent was an independent predictor of higher mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: In this matched cohort study with an 8-year follow-up, survival was better and less repeat revascularizations were needed among patients undergoing elective CABG for the treatment of multivessel disease as compared with the stent group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15854934     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.11.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

Review 1.  Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?

Authors:  Ross M Reul
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

Review 2.  The life and hard times of a coronary surgeon.

Authors:  Bernard S Goldman
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  The comparative efficacy of percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization in 2009: a review.

Authors:  Stephen A May; James M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

4.  Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies.

Authors:  William S Weintraub; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Jocelyn M Weiss; Sean M O'Brien; Eric D Peterson; Paul Kolm; Zugui Zhang; Lloyd W Klein; Richard E Shaw; Charles McKay; Laura L Ritzenthaler; Jeffrey J Popma; John C Messenger; David M Shahian; Frederick L Grover; John E Mayer; Cynthia M Shewan; Kirk N Garratt; Issam D Moussa; George D Dangas; Fred H Edwards
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  [Current evidence-based situation in coronary revascularization--CABG vs. PCI and diabetes?].

Authors:  M T R Grapow; R von Wattenwyl; H-R Zerkowski
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Composite outcomes in coronary bypass surgery versus percutaneous intervention.

Authors:  Fred H Edwards; David M Shahian; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Frederick L Grover; John E Mayer; Sean M O'Brien; Elizabeth DeLong; Eric D Peterson; Charles McKay; Richard E Shaw; Kirk N Garratt; George D Dangas; John Messenger; Lloyd W Klein; Jeffrey J Popma; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Percutaneous versus surgical interventions for coronary artery disease in those with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ozlem Soran
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Long-term Outcome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared with Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the Elderly.

Authors:  Emad A Barsoum; Basem Azab; Nileshkumar Patel; Jonathan Spagnola; Masood A Shariff; Umar Kaleem; Rewais Morcus; Deepak Asti; Joseph T McGinn; James Lafferty; Donald A McCord
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2016-02-08

9.  Comparing 5-year Outcomes of Aorta-Coronary Bypass Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Performed with New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Non-Diabetic Patients with Multivessel Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients and Intermediate Syntax Score.

Authors:  Firdovsi Ibrahimov; Yusuf Yilmaz; Isfandiyar Ismayilov; Kamran Musayev; Ogtay Oktay Musayev; Shahana Alasgarli; Shafa Shahbazova; Mehriban Isgenderova; Tofig Jahangirov
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2020-06-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.