Literature DB >> 15853445

Retrospective analysis of the safety profile of oral moxifloxacin in elderly patients enrolled in clinical trials.

Vincent T Andriole1, Daniel C Haverstock, Shurjeel H Choudhri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: As aging is associated with physiological changes, including renal and hepatic insufficiency, and a higher risk of drug interactions, special attention needs to be directed towards the safety of medications in the elderly. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the safety of oral moxifloxacin in elderly patients who were enrolled in clinical trials and to compare these results to those of other commonly used antibacterials.
METHODS: Safety data from 27 prospective, randomised, comparative phase II/III trials of oral moxifloxacin included in the Bayer clinical trial database were pooled and analysed by age group (<65 years of age, 65-74 years of age, > or = 75 years of age) and by treatment group (moxifloxacin vs comparator). The primary endpoints included rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (all adverse events regardless of causality), drug-related adverse events, drug-related serious adverse events, deaths and premature discontinuations because of a treatment-emergent adverse event. A treatment by age group interaction test was used to determine if the comparison between moxifloxacin and the comparator group in the incidence rates of any treatment-emergent or drug-related adverse events were affected by increasing age.
RESULTS: Of the 12 231 patients who had valid safety data, 6270 had been treated with oral moxifloxacin and 5961 with a comparator antibacterial. The most frequently used comparators were cefuroxime and clarithromycin. Most patients (n = 9671) were <65 years of age (4939 moxifloxacin, 4732 comparator); 1636 patients were 65-74 years of age (842 moxifloxacin, 794 comparator); and 924 patients were > or = 75 years of age (489 moxifloxacin, 435 comparator). The treatment by age group interaction test revealed that the comparison of drug-related adverse event rates between the moxifloxacin and comparator group were not affected by increasing age (p = 0.43). Rates of premature termination between the moxifloxacin and comparator treatment groups also did not increase with age (p = 0.552). No arrhythmias related to corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation were reported following oral moxifloxacin or comparator treatment in this large group of young and elderly patients. Overall, the number of deaths was similar between the treatment groups (17 moxifloxacin, 19 comparator).
CONCLUSIONS: Drug-related adverse event rates associated with oral moxifloxacin or the comparator therapy used in these studies did not significantly increase with advancing age. This pooled analysis suggests that oral moxifloxacin can be safely used in elderly patients with characteristics consistent with those enrolled into the clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15853445     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200528050-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.228


  21 in total

1.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Profile of moxifloxacin drug interactions.

Authors:  H Stass; D Kubitza
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Safety profile of ofloxacin in elderly patients.

Authors:  R Fostini; M Girelli; P Dalle Vedove; M Benedetti; G Recchia
Journal:  Drugs Exp Clin Res       Date:  1988

Review 4.  Moxifloxacin: clinical efficacy and safety.

Authors:  C M Culley; M K Lacy; N Klutman; B Edwards
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 5.  Quinolones in the aged.

Authors:  L E Nicolle
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Retrospective analysis of the safety profile of oral and intravenous ciprofloxacin in a geriatric population.

Authors:  A Heyd; D Haverstock
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 7.  Treatment of infections in elderly patients.

Authors:  T T Yoshikawa; D C Norman
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.456

8.  Sinus tissue concentration of moxifloxacin after a single oral dose.

Authors:  Paulo Borges Dinis; Maria Conceição Monteiro; Maria Luz Martins; Nuno Silva; José Guimarães Morais
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Diffusion of oral and intravenous 400 mg once-daily moxifloxacin into lung tissue at pharmacokinetic steady-state.

Authors:  D Breilh; J Jougon; S Djabarouti; J B Gordien; F Xuereb; J F Velly; P Arvis; V Landreau; M C Saux
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.714

Review 10.  The use of oral fluoroquinolones in nursing home patients.

Authors:  T M File; J S Tan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.923

View more
  12 in total

1.  A rabbit Langendorff heart proarrhythmia model: predictive value for clinical identification of Torsades de Pointes.

Authors:  C L Lawrence; M H Bridgland-Taylor; C E Pollard; T G Hammond; J-P Valentin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Safety considerations of fluoroquinolones in the elderly: an update.

Authors:  Ralf Stahlmann; Hartmut Lode
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Comparison of the IKr blockers moxifloxacin, dofetilide and E-4031 in five screening models of pro-arrhythmia reveals lack of specificity of isolated cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  L Nalos; R Varkevisser; M K B Jonsson; M J C Houtman; J D Beekman; R van der Nagel; M B Thomsen; G Duker; P Sartipy; T P de Boer; M Peschar; M B Rook; T A B van Veen; M A G van der Heyden; M A Vos
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  No proarrhythmic properties of the antibiotics Moxifloxacin or Azithromycin in anaesthetized dogs with chronic-AV block.

Authors:  M B Thomsen; J D M Beekman; N J M Attevelt; A Takahara; A Sugiyama; K Chiba; M A Vos
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Exposure to antibacterial agents with QT liability in 14 European countries: trends over an 8-year period.

Authors:  Emanuel Raschi; Elisabetta Poluzzi; Chiara Zuliani; Arno Muller; Herman Goossens; Fabrizio De Ponti
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  A significant interaction between moxifloxacin and warfarin in a patient with a mitral bioprosthetic valve.

Authors:  Fatih Yildiz; Behice Kurtaran; Murat Cayli; Aslihan Candevir; Zehra Sümbül
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Safety profile of the respiratory fluoroquinolone moxifloxacin: comparison with other fluoroquinolones and other antibacterial classes.

Authors:  Françoise Van Bambeke; Paul M Tulkens
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Increased Late Sodium Current Contributes to the Electrophysiological Effects of Chronic, but Not Acute, Dofetilide Administration.

Authors:  Xiaoliang S Qiu; Samuel Chauveau; Evgeny P Anyukhovsky; Tania Rahim; Ya-Ping Jiang; Erin Harleton; Steven J Feinmark; Richard Z Lin; Ruben Coronel; Michiel J Janse; Tobias Opthof; Tove S Rosen; Ira S Cohen; Michael R Rosen
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-04

9.  Moxifloxacin safety: an analysis of 14 years of clinical data.

Authors:  Paul M Tulkens; Pierre Arvis; Frank Kruesmann
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2012-06-01

Review 10.  Hepatic safety of antibiotics used in primary care.

Authors:  Raúl J Andrade; Paul M Tulkens
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 5.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.