BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Drug development requires the testing of new chemical entities for adverse effects. For cardiac safety screening, improved assays are urgently needed. Isolated adult cardiomyocytes (CM) and human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CM) could be used to identify pro-arrhythmic compounds. In the present study, five assays were employed to investigate their sensitivity and specificity for evaluating the pro-arrhythmic properties of I(Kr) blockers, using moxifloxacin (safe compound) and dofetilide or E-4031 (unsafe compounds). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Assays included the anaesthetized remodelled chronic complete AV block (CAVB) dog, the anaesthetized methoxamine-sensitized unremodelled rabbit, multi-cellular hESC-CM clusters, isolated CM obtained from CAVB dogs and isolated CM obtained from the normal rabbit. Arrhythmic outcome was defined as Torsade de Pointes (TdP) in the animal models and early afterdepolarizations (EADs) in the cell models. KEY RESULTS: At clinically relevant concentrations (5-12 µM), moxifloxacin was free of pro-arrhythmic properties in all assays with the exception of the isolated CM, in which 10 µM induced EADs in 35% of the CAVB CM and in 23% of the rabbit CM. At supra-therapeutic concentrations (≥100 µM), moxifloxacin was pro-arrhythmic in the isolated rabbit CM (33%), in the hESC-CM clusters (18%), and in the methoxamine rabbit (17%). Dofetilide and E-4031 induced EADs or TdP in all assays (50-83%), and the induction correlated with a significant increase in beat-to-beat variability of repolarization. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Isolated cardiomyocytes lack specificity to discriminate between TdP liability of the I(Kr) blocking drugs moxifloxacin and dofetilide or E4031.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Drug development requires the testing of new chemical entities for adverse effects. For cardiac safety screening, improved assays are urgently needed. Isolated adult cardiomyocytes (CM) and human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CM) could be used to identify pro-arrhythmic compounds. In the present study, five assays were employed to investigate their sensitivity and specificity for evaluating the pro-arrhythmic properties of I(Kr) blockers, using moxifloxacin (safe compound) and dofetilide or E-4031 (unsafe compounds). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Assays included the anaesthetized remodelled chronic complete AV block (CAVB) dog, the anaesthetized methoxamine-sensitized unremodelled rabbit, multi-cellular hESC-CM clusters, isolated CM obtained from CAVB dogs and isolated CM obtained from the normal rabbit. Arrhythmic outcome was defined as Torsade de Pointes (TdP) in the animal models and early afterdepolarizations (EADs) in the cell models. KEY RESULTS: At clinically relevant concentrations (5-12 µM), moxifloxacin was free of pro-arrhythmic properties in all assays with the exception of the isolated CM, in which 10 µM induced EADs in 35% of the CAVB CM and in 23% of the rabbit CM. At supra-therapeutic concentrations (≥100 µM), moxifloxacin was pro-arrhythmic in the isolated rabbit CM (33%), in the hESC-CM clusters (18%), and in the methoxaminerabbit (17%). Dofetilide and E-4031 induced EADs or TdP in all assays (50-83%), and the induction correlated with a significant increase in beat-to-beat variability of repolarization. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Isolated cardiomyocytes lack specificity to discriminate between TdP liability of the I(Kr) blocking drugs moxifloxacin and dofetilide or E4031.
Authors: Daniel M Johnson; Jordi Heijman; Chris E Pollard; Jean-Pierre Valentin; Harry J G M Crijns; Najah Abi-Gerges; Paul G A Volders Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Tamás Bányász; Balázs Horváth; László Virág; László Bárándi; Norbert Szentandrássy; Gábor Harmati; János Magyar; Stefano Marangoni; Antonio Zaza; András Varró; Péter P Nánási Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Hiroki Takanari; Vincent J A Bourgonje; Magda S C Fontes; Antonia J A Raaijmakers; Helen Driessen; John A Jansen; Roel van der Nagel; Bart Kok; Leonie van Stuijvenberg; Mohamed Boulaksil; Yoshio Takemoto; Masatoshi Yamazaki; Yukiomi Tsuji; Haruo Honjo; Kaichiro Kamiya; Itsuo Kodama; Mark E Anderson; Marcel A G van der Heyden; Harold V M van Rijen; Toon A B van Veen; Marc A Vos Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Adriana Blazeski; Renjun Zhu; David W Hunter; Seth H Weinberg; Kenneth R Boheler; Elias T Zambidis; Leslie Tung Journal: Prog Biophys Mol Biol Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: P Champeroux; J Y Le Guennec; S Jude; C Laigot; A Maurin; M L Sola; J S L Fowler; S Richard; J Thireau Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Christopher Rao; Themistoklis Prodromakis; Ljudmila Kolker; Umar A R Chaudhry; Tatiana Trantidou; Arun Sridhar; Claire Weekes; Patrizia Camelliti; Sian E Harding; Ara Darzi; Magdi H Yacoub; Thanos Athanasiou; Cesare M Terracciano Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Pei-Chi Yang; Kevin R DeMarco; Parya Aghasafari; Mao-Tsuen Jeng; John R D Dawson; Slava Bekker; Sergei Y Noskov; Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Igor Vorobyov; Colleen E Clancy Journal: Circ Res Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 17.367