Literature DB >> 15853336

Why do the heavy-atom analogues of acetylene E2H2 (E = Si-Pb) exhibit unusual structures?

Matthias Lein1, Andreas Krapp, Gernot Frenking.   

Abstract

DFT calculations at BP86/QZ4P have been carried out for different structures of E(2)H(2) (E = C, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb) with the goal to explain the unusual equilibrium geometries of the heavier group 14 homologues where E = Si-Pb. The global energy minima of the latter molecules have a nonplanar doubly bridged structure A followed by the singly bridged planar form B, the vinylidene-type structure C, and the trans-bent isomer D1. The energetically high-lying trans-bent structure D2 possessing an electron sextet at E and the linear form HEEH, which are not minima on the PES, have also been studied. The unusual structures of E(2)H(2) (E = Si-Pb) are explained with the interactions between the EH moieties in the (X(2)Pi) electronic ground state which differ from C(2)H(2), which is bound through interactions between CH in the a(4)Sigma(-) excited state. Bonding between two (X(2)Pi) fragments of the heavier EH hydrides is favored over the bonding in the a(4)Sigma(-) excited state because the X(2)Pi --> a(4)Sigma(-) excitation energy of EH (E = Si-Pb) is significantly higher than for CH. The doubly bridged structure A of E(2)H(2) has three bonding orbital contributions: one sigma bond and two E-H donor-acceptor bonds. The singly bridged isomer B also has three bonding orbital contributions: one pi bond, one E-H donor-acceptor bond, and one lone-pair donor-acceptor bond. The trans-bent form D1 has one pi bond and two lone-pair donor-acceptor bonds, while D2 has only one sigma bond. The strength of the stabilizing orbital contributions has been estimated with an energy decomposition analysis, which also gives the bonding contributions of the quasi-classical electrostatic interactions.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 15853336     DOI: 10.1021/ja042295c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  8 in total

1.  Quadruple bonding in C2 and analogous eight-valence electron species.

Authors:  Sason Shaik; David Danovich; Wei Wu; Peifeng Su; Henry S Rzepa; Philippe C Hiberty
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 24.427

2.  A stable heavier group 14 analogue of vinylidene.

Authors:  Arnab Rit; Jesús Campos; Haoyu Niu; Simon Aldridge
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 24.427

3.  Reaction mechanism of CH3M≡MCH 3 (M=C, Si, Ge) with C2H4: [2+1] or [2+2] cycloaddition?

Authors:  Suhong Huo; Xiaoyan Li; Yanli Zeng; Shijun Zheng; Lingpeng Meng
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Is It Possible To Prepare and Stabilize Triple-Bonded Thallium≡Antimony Molecules Using Substituents?

Authors:  Jia-Syun Lu; Ming-Chung Yang; Ming-Der Su
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2018-08-30

5.  A computational study to determine whether substituents make E13[triple bond, length as m-dash]nitrogen (E13 = B, Al, Ga, In, and Tl) triple bonds synthetically accessible.

Authors:  Shi-Lin Zhang; Ming-Chung Yang; Ming-Der Su
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 6.  Recent advances of group 14 dimetallenes and dimetallynes in bond activation and catalysis.

Authors:  Franziska Hanusch; Lisa Groll; Shigeyoshi Inoue
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  Substituent Effects on the Stability of Thallium and Phosphorus Triple Bonds: A Density Functional Study.

Authors:  Jia-Syun Lu; Ming-Chung Yang; Ming-Der Su
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Understanding the Uniqueness of 2p Elements in Periodic Tables.

Authors:  Zhen-Ling Wang; Han-Shi Hu; László von Szentpály; Hermann Stoll; Stephan Fritzsche; Pekka Pyykkö; W H Eugen Schwarz; Jun Li
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.236

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.