Literature DB >> 15852165

[Ahmed drainage device implant. Our experience between 1995 and 2003].

F J Montañez1, E Laso, M Suñer, C Amaya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the indications, results and complications of the Ahmed drainage device implanted between January 1995 and December 2003.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 70 eyes in 65 patients. We analysed: the indications for surgery; the preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), the postoperative IOP at 1 and 3 months, 1, 2 and 3 years after surgery; and the short and long term postoperative complications. We defined an absolute success as an IOP between 5 and 21 mmHg without glaucoma medications, relative success the same IOP levels whilst taking glaucoma medications and failure as an IOP of less than 5 and more than 22 mmHg.
RESULTS: The most frequent indications for use of the drainage device were: neovascular glaucoma (45.7%), no response to other glaucoma surgery (20%), aphakic glaucoma (10%) and traumatic glaucoma (8.5%). Mean preoperative IOP was 39 mmHg. Mean postoperative IOP was: 19.7 mmHg (1 month), 21.6 mmHg (3 months), 19.6 mmHg (1 year), 18 mmHg (2 years) and 18.6 mmHg (3 years). The most frequent early complications were athalamia and hiphema. The most frequent late complications were tube or body valve extrusion and fibrotic reaction around the valve.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the indications and success rates are similar to those previously reported. Visual acuity assessment is not of value in this group of patients because of their multiple associated ophthalmic pathologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15852165     DOI: 10.4321/s0365-66912005000400007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol        ISSN: 0365-6691


  6 in total

1.  The Choice of Drainage Device in Complicated Glaucomas: Comparing Ahmed and Baerveldt Implants.

Authors:  Marilita M Moschos; Eirini Nitoda; Nikolaos Gouliopoulos; Sophia Androudi; Christos Damaskos; Konstantinos Laios; Eleni Bagkli; Nikolaos Garmpis; George Kitsos
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Tube Exposure Repair.

Authors:  Stirbu Oana; Jorge Vila
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2012-10-16

Review 3.  Ahmed glaucoma valve implant: surgical technique and complications.

Authors:  Ivano Riva; Gloria Roberti; Francesco Oddone; Anastasios Gp Konstas; Luciano Quaranta
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-17

4.  Comparison of Locally Sourced Pericardium and Other Conventional Patch Graft Materials in a Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery.

Authors:  Shruti Aggarwal; Candice Kremer; Stephanie Engelhard; Sandra Johnson
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2021 Jan-Apr

5.  Comparison of Outcomes Following Glaucoma Drainage Tube Surgery Between Primary and Secondary Glaucomas, and Between Phakic and Pseudophakic eyes.

Authors:  Emily F Dawson; Brady E Culpepper; Charlotte A Bolch; Phuong T Nguyen; Alissa M Meyer; Cooper D Rodgers; Mary Kate Wilson; Ryan J Smith; Nicole C Rosenberg; C Richard Blake; Mark B Sherwood
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2021-11-24

6.  Short term outcome of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in management of refractory glaucoma in a tertiary hospital in Oman.

Authors:  Manali R Shah; Rajiv B Khandekar; Rajiv Zutshi; Rahima Mahrooqi
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.