Literature DB >> 1585060

A biomechanical analysis of four sprint start positions.

P K Schot1, K M Knutzen.   

Abstract

The sprint starts of 12 skilled collegiate sprinter/hurdlers were filmed for four different sprint start conditions. Ground reaction forces were collected for the first step out of the blocks and velocities through a 2-m speed trap immediately following the first support phase were recorded. The subjects employed their preferred right-left leg placement in the blocks, while the anterior-posterior spacing of the front block with respect to the starting line and the amount of forward lean in the set position were varied. Four positions were constructed that accounted for anthropometric differences. The four positions consisted of combinations of two arm orientations (forward lean and perpendicular to ground) and two front block to starting line distances (bunched and elongated). Kinematic data were reduced to provide center of mass position and velocity measures and analyzed for critical periods throughout the starting action. Selected critical events from the first step kinetic records were also analyzed. The results indicated that the elongated starting positions resulted in greater horizontal displacement, greater propelling impulse, increased first step toe-off velocity, and greater average velocity through a 2-m speed trap. Arm orientation effects were less well defined. Forward lean tended to result in greater vertical velocity at block clearance and horizontal velocity at first step toe-off, whereas perpendicular arm positioning resulted in greater 2-m speed trap velocity.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1585060     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1992.10607573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  12 in total

1.  Kinematics of the typical beach flags start for young adult sprinters.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; William M Vickery; Xanne A K Janse de Jonge
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Biomechanics of the sprint start.

Authors:  M J Harland; J R Steele
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Starting Block Performance in Sprinters: A Statistical Method for Identifying Discriminative Parameters of the Performance and an Analysis of the Effect of Providing Feedback over a 6-Week Period.

Authors:  Sylvie Fortier; Fabien A Basset; Ginette A Mbourou; Jérôme Favérial; Normand Teasdale
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Kinematic determinants of early acceleration in field sport athletes.

Authors:  Aron J Murphy; Robert G Lockie; Aaron J Coutts
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Biomechanical Differences in the Sprint Start Between Faster and Slower High-Level Sprinters.

Authors:  Milan Čoh; Stanislav Peharec; Petar Bačić; Krzyszfof Mackala
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Anthropometry-driven block setting improves starting block performance in sprinters.

Authors:  Valentina Cavedon; Marco Sandri; Mariola Pirlo; Nicola Petrone; Carlo Zancanaro; Chiara Milanese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The Biomechanics of the Track and Field Sprint Start: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Neil Edward Bezodis; Steffen Willwacher; Aki Ilkka Tapio Salo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Kinematics that differentiate the beach flags start between elite and non-elite sprinters.

Authors:  R G Lockie; W M Vickery
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.806

9.  The effects of three different rear knee angles on kinematics in the sprint start.

Authors:  C Milanese; M Bertucco; C Zancanaro
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.806

10.  Gender-Related Differences in Mechanics of the Sprint Start and Sprint Acceleration of Top National-Level Sprinters.

Authors:  Dragan M Mirkov; Olivera M Knezevic; Amador Garcia-Ramos; Milan Čoh; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.