Literature DB >> 15849551

Immunosuppression with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil after penetrating high-risk keratoplasty: a retrospective study.

Florian Birnbaum1, Daniel Böhringer, Yevgenia Sokolovska, Rainer Sundmacher, Thomas Reinhard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Graft-prognosis after penetrating high-risk keratoplasty has improved considerably with the use of systemic immunosuppressive medications. In this retrospective investigation we analyzed the long-term results of 417 high-risk keratoplasties with systemic immunosuppression (cyclosporine A [CsA] or mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]).
METHODS: A total of 417 high-risk keratoplasties with postoperative systemic immunosuppression were evaluated retrospectively: CsA has been given in 252 keratoplasties since 1987, aiming at blood trough levels of 120 to 150 ng/mL. Systemic MMF at a daily dose of 2 x 1 g was administered in 149 surgical procedures. After 16 high-risk keratoplasties, combined systemic immunosuppression with CsA and MMF was administered. Systemic immunosuppression was scheduled for 6 to 12 months. All patients received fluocortolone 1 mg/kg body weight per day, tapered over 3 weeks, and topical prednisolone acetate 1%, tapered over 5 months.
RESULTS: Rejection-free graft survival after 1 year was 75% in the CsA group and 89% in the MMF group; 60% of the grafts in the CsA group and 72% of the grafts in the MMF group were rejection-free 3 years postoperatively (Kaplan-Meier log-rank test P=0.03). Clear graft survival after 1 and 3 years was 92% and 77% (CsA) and 96% and 87% (MMF), respectively. The MMF-treated patients showed fewer side effects than the CsA-treated patients. The side effects attributable to both drugs were reversible.
CONCLUSIONS: We found a statistically significant, stronger effect of MMF compared with CsA in preventing immune reactions after high-risk keratoplasty, despite a shorter MMF administration compared with CsA. Both systemic immunosuppressants were shown to have comparable potency regarding clear graft survival and were well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15849551     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000158022.62059.f2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Immune suppression following perforating keratoplasty].

Authors:  F Birnbaum; A Reis; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Intracameral application of corticosteroids for treating severe endothelial rejection after penetrating keratoplasty].

Authors:  F Birnbaum; P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Update on the Management of High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sayena Jabbehdari; Alireza Baradaran Rafii; Ghasem Yazdanpanah; Pedram Hamrah; Edward J Holland; Ali R Djalilian
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2017-02-02

Review 4.  Management of high-risk corneal transplantation.

Authors:  Antonio Di Zazzo; Ahmad Kheirkhah; Tulio B Abud; Sunali Goyal; Reza Dana
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 5.  [Immunosuppressives to prevent rejection reactions after allogeneic corneal transplantation].

Authors:  T Lapp; P Maier; F Birnbaum; G Schlunck; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Influence of combined treatment of low dose rapamycin and cyclosporin A on corneal allograft survival.

Authors:  Svetlana Stanojlovic; Stephan Schlickeiser; Christine Appelt; Katrin Vogt; Isabela Schmitt-Knosalla; Stefanie Haase; Thomas Ritter; Birgit Sawitzki; Uwe Pleyer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Adverse effects of low-dose systemic cyclosporine therapy in high-risk penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jong Joo Lee; Mee Kum Kim; Won Ryang Wee
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Long-term results of allogenic penetrating limbo-keratoplasty: 20 years of experience.

Authors:  S J Lang; D Böhringer; G Geerling; T Reinhard
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Topical pimecrolimus does not prolong clear graft survival in a rat keratoplasty model.

Authors:  Florian Birnbaum; Johannes Schwartzkopff; Christoph Scholz; Thomas Reinhard
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  [Significance of cyclosporin A absorption for effective immunomodulatory therapy after high-risk keratoplasty].

Authors:  N Bailly; I Dunewa; P Schlattmann; P W Rieck
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.