Literature DB >> 15849545

The effect of 2-gram versus 1-gram concentration controlled mycophenolate mofetil on renal transplant outcomes using sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor drug-free immunosuppression.

Stuart M Flechner1, Jing Feng, Barbara Mastroianni, Kathy Savas, Jeffrey Arnovitz, Hazem Moneim, Charles S Modlin, David Goldfarb, Daniel J Cook, Andrew C Novick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We performed a sequential study to determine the efficacy and side effects of low-dose (1 g) mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in a CNI drug avoidance regimen including sirolimus/steroids.
METHODS: A total of 260 kidney-only recipients were given basiliximab (232) or thymoglobulin (28) induction, and sirolimus/steroids. In addition, 160 recipients were begun on standard MMF 1 g twice daily (2-g group), while 100 recipients were begun on low-dose MMF 500 mg twice daily (1-g group). The 1-g recipients were concentration controlled to keep mycophenolic acid (MPA) C0 levels at 1.8-4 microg/ml.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in demographics between the groups. At 6 months there were no significant differences between the 2-g and 1-g MMF groups in patient survival (96.8% vs. 96%), graft survival (92.5% vs. 95%), biopsy-confirmed and treated acute rejection (8.8% vs. 13%), or mean creatinine mg/dL (1.41+/-0.52 vs. 1.47+/-0.67), respectively. Mean MPA C0 levels microg/ml were (4.7 vs. 2.3) at 1 month, (4.1 vs. 3.1) at 3 months, and (3.9 vs. 2.4) at 6 months. There were no significant differences at 1, 3, or 6 months in mean WBC, HgB, or platelets, or wound complications. There were significant reductions in the number of patients reporting nausea-vomiting-dyspepsia (20.6% vs. 8%, P=0.007), diarrhea (34.3% vs. 20%, P=0.01), and abdominal pains (10.6% vs. 4%, P=0.05), between the 2-g and 1-g MMF groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of concentration-controlled 1-g MMF results in comparable transplant outcomes with less GI toxicity during the first 6 months posttransplant in a CNI drug-free sirolimus based immunosuppressive regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15849545     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000155430.52845.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Modern immunosuppression following renal transplantation. Standard or tailor made?].

Authors:  K Budde; M Giessing; L Liefeldt; H-H Neumayer; P Glander
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The occurrence of diarrhea not related to the pharmacokinetics of MPA and its metabolites in liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Zhang Wei Xia; Chen Yong Jun; Chen Hao; Chen Bing; Shi Min Min; Xie Jun Jie
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Evaluation of mycophenolate mofetil for initial treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  Paul J Martin; Barry E Storer; Scott D Rowley; Mary E D Flowers; Stephanie J Lee; Paul A Carpenter; John R Wingard; Paul J Shaughnessy; Marcel P DeVetten; Madan Jagasia; Joseph W Fay; Koen van Besien; Vikas Gupta; Carrie Kitko; Laura J Johnston; Richard T Maziarz; Mukta Arora; Pamala A Jacobson; Daniel Weisdorf
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Modulation of tolerance to the transgene product in a nonhuman primate model of AAV-mediated gene transfer to liver.

Authors:  Federico Mingozzi; Nicole C Hasbrouck; Etiena Basner-Tschakarjan; Shyrie A Edmonson; Daniel J Hui; Denise E Sabatino; Shangzhen Zhou; J Fraser Wright; Haiyan Jiang; Glenn F Pierce; Valder R Arruda; Katherine A High
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 22.113

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.