Literature DB >> 16328215

[Modern immunosuppression following renal transplantation. Standard or tailor made?].

K Budde1, M Giessing, L Liefeldt, H-H Neumayer, P Glander.   

Abstract

Renal transplantation is by far the best therapeutic option for end-stage kidney disease with respect to quality of life, psychosocial rehabilitation, and even patient survival. Optimal immunosuppressive therapy should provide effective prophylaxis of both acute rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction. Thus immunosuppressive therapy should help to maintain good renal function and could help to prevent premature death of the recipient. With the introduction of new immunosuppressants over the last decade a dramatic reduction of acute rejection rates from approximately 50% to 15-30% could be achieved. However, the search for novel immunosuppressive drugs continues, drugs which not only lead to effective prevention of acute rejection, but also have an impact on chronic allograft dysfunction and prevent further deterioration of this multifactorial process. Based on a short presentation of the "three signal model" of immunoactivation, the most important mechanisms and characteristics of the presently available immunosuppressants are described. Because the immunosuppressive objectives change over time, a phase-dependent adaptation is necessary. At present, most centers in Germany use an immunosuppressive combination therapy, consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI; cyclosporine or tacrolimus), a glucocorticoid (prednisolone or methylprednisolone), and mycophenolic acid (MPA), which is eventually combined with an antibody (e.g., IL-2R antibody) for induction. In contrast to the clear situation 10 years ago, highly specialized knowledge is required today with respect to mechanism of action, side effects, and potential interactions. This may enable the physician to adopt patient-oriented optimal immunosuppression. In the near future more individualized treatment options will be employed, which are adapted to the characteristics and side effects of the immunosuppressant, as well as to the characteristics of the donor, the recipient, and the transplanted organ such as immunology and ischemia. Another aspect is the reduction or elimination of some immunosuppressants at the earliest possible time. With new diagnostic and genetic markers the relationship between recipient and transplanted organ will be characterized better in the future and therapy will become more individualized. Altogether, these measures as well as optimized supportive therapy will help to further improve the longevity of the transplanted organ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16328215     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-005-0958-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  47 in total

Review 1.  Induction protocols: yesterday, today, and tomorrow.

Authors:  D Abramowicz; M Wissing
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1999 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 2.  Strategies to improve long-term outcomes after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Manuel Pascual; Tom Theruvath; Tatsuo Kawai; Nina Tolkoff-Rubin; A Benedict Cosimi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era.

Authors:  Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Jesse D Schold; Titte R Srinivas; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  First human trial of FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, in stable renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Klemens Budde; Robert L Schmouder; Reinhard Brunkhorst; Bjorn Nashan; Peter W Lücker; Thomas Mayer; Somesh Choudhury; Andrej Skerjanec; Gerolf Kraus; Hans H Neumayer
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 5.  Review of the proliferation inhibitor everolimus.

Authors:  Björn Nashan
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.206

6.  Mycophenolate mofetil reduces late renal allograft loss independent of acute rejection.

Authors:  A O Ojo; H U Meier-Kriesche; J A Hanson; A B Leichtman; D Cibrik; J C Magee; R A Wolfe; L Y Agodoa; B Kaplan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Pre-transplant inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity is associated with clinical outcome after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Petra Glander; Pia Hambach; Kay-Patrick Braun; Lutz Fritsche; Markus Giessing; Ingnid Mai; Gunilla Einecke; Johannes Waiser; Hans-Hellmut Neumayer; Klemens Budde
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Rituximab as treatment for refractory kidney transplant rejection.

Authors:  Yolanda T Becker; Bryan N Becker; John D Pirsch; Hans W Sollinger
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Predictors of success in conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus in chronic allograft dysfunction.

Authors:  Fritz Diekmann; Klemens Budde; Federico Oppenheimer; Lutz Fritsche; Hans H Neumayer; Josep M Campistol
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Outcome of kidney transplantation in patients with inherited thrombophilia: data of a prospective study.

Authors:  Stefan Heidenreich; Ralf Junker; Heiner Wolters; Detlef Lang; Sabine Hessing; Gitta Nitsche; Ulrike Nowak-Göttl
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.121

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Kidney transplantation in urology. Past--present--future].

Authors:  J Schubert; K Dreikorn; H Seiter; H Huland; D Jonas; T Kälble; G Wolf; T Steiner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Evaluation of the impact of Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression on Heidelberg liver transplant cohort (HDTACRO): Study protocol for an investigator initiated, non-interventional prospective study.

Authors:  Elias Khajeh; Georgios Polychronidis; Ali Ramouz; Parnian Alamdari; Anastasia Lemekhova; Melisa Saracevic; Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh; Omid Ghamarnejad; Ali Majlesara; Sepehr Abbasi Dezfouli; Arash Nickkholgh; Karl Heinz Weiss; Christian Rupp; Arianeb Mehrabi; Markus Mieth
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.