| Literature DB >> 15849470 |
Bülent Salman1, Osman Yüksel, Oktay Irkörücü, Nusret Akyürek, Tugan Tezcaner, Ibrahim Doğan, Ozlem Erdem, Ertan Tatlicioğlu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Delay of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the diagnosis of biliary colic may increase the probability of recurrent emergency admission while awaiting elective cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the possible advantages and safety of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ULC) with elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) in patients with biliary colic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2003, 75 patients with biliary colic were included in this study. The patients were classified into following two groups: patients who had ULC in 24 h were in group I (n = 28) and patients who had ELC (mean interval 4.22 +/- 1.42 months) were in group II (n = 35). Conversion to open cholecystectomy, operative time, postoperative hospital stay, costs, and complications were evaluated.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15849470 DOI: 10.1159/000085300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dig Surg ISSN: 0253-4886 Impact factor: 2.588