Literature DB >> 10815564

Experimental comparative study of various mouthguards.

J Hoffmann1, G Alfter, N K Rudolph, G Göz.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical and physical properties of several standard size commercially available mouthguards. For the purpose of objective testing, a special study model, which the various gum shield devices could be fitted onto, was developed to record tooth deflection caused by impact forces induced by a pendulum ram impact testing machine. The data measured on teeth provided with various gum shield devices were correlated with those of unprotected teeth; this enabled the individual cushioning effects of the respective devices and their specific force conduction to be evaluated. Using mouthguards considerably diminishes the deflection of the teeth subjected to stress in comparison with the row of unprotected teeth. In addition, force is transmitted to the adjacent teeth all the way to the distal regions of the row of teeth. The individual cushioning effects are directly correlated to the thickness of the material; the force distribution is determined by the rigidity of the gum shield device. The devices examined showed considerable differences with regard to force distribution and dimensioning. The study showed that this was due to the thickness of the materials, the manufacturing process and the composition of the materials of the devices examined. In comparison to laboratory-produced devices of similar material thickness, the devices that were designed to be fitted by the user achieved significantly poorer results as regards both cushioning properties and dissipation of exerted forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10815564     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1999.tb00794.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endod Dent Traumatol        ISSN: 0109-2502


  5 in total

Review 1.  Scale of protection and the various types of sports mouthguard.

Authors:  D G Patrick; R van Noort; M S Found
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  [Dentoalveolar trauma. Analysis of 4763 patients with 6237 injuries in 10 years].

Authors:  T Tuli; O Hächl; M Rasse; F Kloss; R Gassner
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-09

Review 3.  Factors affecting sports-related orofacial injuries and the importance of mouthguards.

Authors:  Elif Bahar Tuna; Emre Ozel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Mouthguards in sport activities : history, physical properties and injury prevention effectiveness.

Authors:  Joseph J Knapik; Stephen W Marshall; Robyn B Lee; Salima S Darakjy; Sarah B Jones; Timothy A Mitchener; Georgia G delaCruz; Bruce H Jones
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  A preliminary report of structural changes to mouthguards during 1 season of high school football.

Authors:  Gianluca Del Rossi; Peter Lisman; Marco A Leyte-Vidal
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.