Literature DB >> 15848465

Excellent liver transplant survival rates under the MELD/PELD system.

R B Freeman1, A Harper, E B Edwards.   

Abstract

The MELD/PELD (M/P) system for liver allocation was implemented on February 27, 2002, in the United States. Since then sufficient time has elapsed to allow for assessment of posttransplant survival rates under this system. We analyzed 4163 deceased donor liver transplants performed between February 27, 2002, and December 31, 2003, for whom follow-up reporting was 95% and 67% complete at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed 1-year patient and graft survival rates for status 1 of 76.9% and 70.4%, respectively, and 87.3% and 82.9% for patients prioritized by M/P (P < .0001 for status 1 vs M/P). When adult candidates were stratified by MELD score quartile at transplant, 1-year survival rates were 89.5%, 88.3%, 86.6%, and 78.1% for lowest to highest quartile (P = .0002) and graft survival rates were similarly distributed (85.0%, 84.5%, 82.7%, 73.0%, P < .0001). Candidates with hepatocellular cancer (89.6%) and other MELD score exceptions (88.8%) had slightly higher 1-year survival rates compared with standard MELD recipients (86.0%), which did not reach statistical significance (P = .089). Pediatric recipients had slightly better patient (88.7%) and graft (86.5%) survival rates at 1 year than adults but there were no significant differences among the PELD strata due to small numbers of patients in each PELD quartile. We conclude that patient and graft survival have remained excellent since implementation of the MELD/PELD system. Although recipients with MELD scores in the highest quartile have reduced survival compared with other quartiles, their 1-year survival rate is acceptable when their extreme risk of dying without a transplant is taken into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15848465     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  7 in total

Review 1.  Liver transplantation organ allocation between Child and MELD.

Authors:  Ivo Graziadei
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2006-07

Review 2.  Model for end-stage liver disease: end of the first decade.

Authors:  Sumeet K Asrani; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 6.126

Review 3.  Model for end-stage liver disease score and MELD exceptions: 15 years later.

Authors:  Sumeet K Asrani; Patrick S Kamath
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list.

Authors:  W Ray Kim; Scott W Biggins; Walter K Kremers; Russell H Wiesner; Patrick S Kamath; Joanne T Benson; Erick Edwards; Terry M Therneau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  [Model for end-stage liver disease. New basis of allocation for liver transplantations].

Authors:  G E Jung; J Encke; J Schmidt; A Rahmel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Clinical outcome of 1,000 consecutive cases of liver transplantation: a single center experience.

Authors:  Bong Jun Kwak; Dong Goo Kim; Jae Hyun Han; Ho Joong Choi; Si Hyun Bae; Young Kyoung You; Jong Young Choi; Seung Kew Yoon
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 7.  Predicting survival after liver transplantation based on pre-transplant MELD score: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Kristin B Klein; Taenia D Stafinski; Devidas Menon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.