Literature DB >> 16937044

Liver transplantation organ allocation between Child and MELD.

Ivo Graziadei1.   

Abstract

Liver transplantation (LT) has been established as the most effective therapy for acute and chronic liver diseases over the last few decades due to its excellent long-term results. At the beginning of the LT era, donor organs were allocated based on waiting time. However, as the number of LT candidates consistently increased, a specific allocation system became necessary to prioritize the large number of patients waiting for a limited pool of organs. The LT candidates were categorized into different urgency levels based on their hospital status, degree of liver disease as measured by the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, and accompanying complications of liver disease, such as ascites, variceal bleeding or hepatocellular carcinoma. The majority of European countries, including Austria, still rely on this organ allocation system. In the United States, however, a new allocation system based on the risk of death without transplantation, assessed by the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), was initiated in February 2002. Recent reports have shown that the introduction of the MELD system led to a reduction in waiting list mortality, but also that the MELD score has several limitations that call for further refinements. In the transplant community there are reasonable doubts that MELD is actually superior to the Child-Turcotte Pugh score. Therefore, the optimal liver organ allocation system is yet to be defined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16937044     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-006-0317-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  26 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic models including the Child-Pugh, MELD and Mayo risk scores--where are we and where should we go?

Authors:  Erik Christensen
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  Persistent ascites and low serum sodium identify patients with cirrhosis and low MELD scores who are at high risk for early death.

Authors:  Douglas M Heuman; Souheil G Abou-Assi; Adil Habib; Leslie M Williams; R Todd Stravitz; Arun J Sanyal; Robert A Fisher; Anastasios A Mihas
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  MELD: the holy grail of organ allocation?

Authors:  Richard B Freeman
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 4.  Development of the allocation system for deceased donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  John M Coombes; James F Trotter
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2005-05

5.  A prognostic model for predicting survival in cirrhosis with ascites.

Authors:  G Fernández-Esparrach; A Sánchez-Fueyo; P Ginès; J Uriz; L Quintó; P J Ventura; A Cárdenas; M Guevara; P Sort; W Jiménez; R Bataller; V Arroyo; J Rodés
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 25.083

6.  A comparison of liver transplantation outcomes in the pre- vs. post-MELD eras.

Authors:  F Kanwal; G S Dulai; B M R Spiegel; H F Yee; I M Gralnek
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  MELD vs Child-Pugh and creatinine-modified Child-Pugh score for predicting survival in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  George V Papatheodoridis; Evangelos Cholongitas; Eleni Dimitriadou; Giota Touloumi; Vassilios Sevastianos; Athanasios J Archimandritis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.

Authors:  Pratima Sharma; Vijayan Balan; Jose L Hernandez; Ann M Harper; Erick B Edwards; Hector Rodriguez-Luna; Thomas Byrne; Hugo E Vargas; David Mulligan; Jorge Rakela; Russell H Wiesner
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan.

Authors:  Richard B Freeman; Russell H Wiesner; Erick Edwards; Ann Harper; Robert Merion; Robert Wolfe
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  2 in total

1.  Liver transplantation in Greek children: 15 years experience.

Authors:  Ioannis Xinias; Antigoni Mavroudi; Olga Vrani; Georgios Imvrios; Dimitrios Takoudas; Kleomenis Spiroglou
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2010-09-06

2.  Comparison of Cox's Regression Model and Parametric Models in Evaluating the Prognostic Factors for Survival after Liver Transplantation in Shiraz during 2000-2012.

Authors:  R Adelian; J Jamali; N Zare; S M T Ayatollahi; G R Pooladfar; N Roustaei
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2015
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.