BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tumor hypoxia is a known factor of radioresistance in HNSCC. CTP is a noninvasive method of measuring tumor perfusion in vivo. The purpose of our study was to determine serial changes in tumor perfusion in HNSCC during a course of RT by using CTP and to correlate tumor perfusion measurements to LRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed in 15 patients with HNSCC receiving definitive RT who underwent serial CTP before RT; at weeks 2, 4, and 6 of RT; and 6 weeks after RT. The median follow-up was 28 months (range, 6-44 months). Thirteen patients achieved LRC, and 2 patients had LRF. Tumor perfusion parameters, including BF, BV, MTT, and CP, were obtained by using a deconvolution-based analysis. RESULTS: Pretreatment tumor BF was significantly higher in patients who achieved LRC, 118.0 mL/100 g/min, compared with those with LRF, 53.4 mL/100 g/min (P = .004). Similarly, pretreatment CP was higher in patients with LRC, 16.6 mL/100 g/min, compared with those with LRF, 7.7 mL/100 g/min (P = .02). At week 2 of RT, tumor BF parameters showed a 27.5% increase versus an 18.1% decrease from pretreatment BF values (P = .046) in patients with LRC and LRF, respectively. A decrease in BF and BV was observed in both groups 6 weeks after RT compared with these values at baseline scanning. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in tumor BF and CP by using CTP early during a course of RT predicts LRC in patients with HNSCC treated with RT.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Tumor hypoxia is a known factor of radioresistance in HNSCC. CTP is a noninvasive method of measuring tumor perfusion in vivo. The purpose of our study was to determine serial changes in tumor perfusion in HNSCC during a course of RT by using CTP and to correlate tumor perfusion measurements to LRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed in 15 patients with HNSCC receiving definitive RT who underwent serial CTP before RT; at weeks 2, 4, and 6 of RT; and 6 weeks after RT. The median follow-up was 28 months (range, 6-44 months). Thirteen patients achieved LRC, and 2 patients had LRF. Tumor perfusion parameters, including BF, BV, MTT, and CP, were obtained by using a deconvolution-based analysis. RESULTS: Pretreatment tumor BF was significantly higher in patients who achieved LRC, 118.0 mL/100 g/min, compared with those with LRF, 53.4 mL/100 g/min (P = .004). Similarly, pretreatment CP was higher in patients with LRC, 16.6 mL/100 g/min, compared with those with LRF, 7.7 mL/100 g/min (P = .02). At week 2 of RT, tumor BF parameters showed a 27.5% increase versus an 18.1% decrease from pretreatment BF values (P = .046) in patients with LRC and LRF, respectively. A decrease in BF and BV was observed in both groups 6 weeks after RT compared with these values at baseline scanning. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in tumor BF and CP by using CTP early during a course of RT predicts LRC in patients with HNSCC treated with RT.
Authors: D Gandhi; D B Chepeha; T Miller; R C Carlos; C R Bradford; R Karamchandani; F Worden; A Eisbruch; T N Teknos; G T Wolf; S K Mukherji Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Dheeraj Gandhi; Ellen G Hoeffner; Ruth C Carlos; Ian Case; Suresh K Mukherji Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: S Bisdas; Z Rumboldt; K Surlan-Popovic; M Baghi; T S Koh; T J Vogl; M G Mack Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Marshall R Posner; Diane M Hershock; Cesar R Blajman; Elizabeth Mickiewicz; Eric Winquist; Vera Gorbounova; Sergei Tjulandin; Dong M Shin; Kevin Cullen; Thomas J Ervin; Barbara A Murphy; Luis E Raez; Roger B Cohen; Monica Spaulding; Roy B Tishler; Berta Roth; Rosana del Carmen Viroglio; Varagur Venkatesan; Ilya Romanov; Sanjiv Agarwala; K William Harter; Matthew Dugan; Anthony Cmelak; Arnold M Markoe; Paul W Read; Lynn Steinbrenner; A Dimitrios Colevas; Charles M Norris; Robert I Haddad Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-10-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Boda-Heggemann; M Guckenberger; U Ganswindt; C Belka; H Wertz; M Blessing; F Wenz; M Fuss; F Lohr Journal: Radiologe Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 0.635
Authors: Minh Tam Truong; Richard Lee; Naoko Saito; Muhammad M Qureshi; Al Ozonoff; Paul B Romesser; Jimmy Wang; Osamu Sakai Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: N Fujima; D Yoshida; T Sakashita; A Homma; A Tsukahara; K K Tha; K Kudo; H Shirato Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Yuankui Wu; Shruti Agarwal; Craig K Jones; Andrew G Webb; Peter C M van Zijl; Jun Hua; Jay J Pillai Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: H Kuno; M M Qureshi; M N Chapman; B Li; V C Andreu-Arasa; K Onoue; M T Truong; O Sakai Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 3.825