BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) provides the most accurate estimation of renal function. This study investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with impaired renal function having a normal serum creatinine level. We also validated whether the new Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula can be applied in a healthy general population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total 393 participants who had serum creatinine concentration below 132.6 micromol/L without underlying diseases were randomly selected on an address basis in Ansan City. According to the level of GFR, they were divided into 3 groups and we analyzed their clinical characteristics. In 75 subjects, who were randomly selected 25 cases in each group based on GFR estimated by Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) formula, true GFR was measured using the 99mTc-DTPA renal clearance method. RESULTS: A total 393 (male: 106, female: 287) participants were as follows: GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2; 4% (n = 25); 60 < or = GFR < 90 ml/min/1.73 m2; 26.2% (n = 103); GFR > or = 90 ml/min/1.73 m2; 67.4% (n = 265). In the group of decreased GFR, the mean age was older (67.4+/-10.7 vs. 48.7+/-12.8 vs. 39.4+/-8.2 years, p < 0.001), the gender was male (90.33+/-28.77 vs. 110.55+/-31.64, p < 0.001), and amount of proteinuria more increased (0.61 (0.56) vs. 0.33 (0.34) vs. 0.38 (0.33) gm/day, p = 0.007). The accuracy and precision of each formula were assessed by the difference in GFR measured by the 99mTc-DTPA renal clearance method--estimated GFR by each formula (deltaGFR), and the coefficient of determination (r2) of different predictive equations. The results were as follows: deltaGFR = -14.78+/-46.03, r2 = 0.79 (24-hour urinary creatinine clearance), deltaGFR=-16.79+/-57.32, r2 = 0.66 (100/serum creatinine), deltaGFR = 9.54+/-39.18, r2 = 0.87 (C-G formula), deltaGFR = -12.30+/-54.31, r2 = 0.66 (AASK formula), deltaGFR = 8.70+/-37.62, r2 = 0.79 (MDRD formula). Multiple linear regression analysis and logistic regression analysis showed that age, serum creatinine, total cholesterol and 24-hour urinary protein excretion were independently related to GFR and associated with a significant increase in the risk of decrement of GFR. CONCLUSIONS: From these results, a more accurate assessment of renal function should be required in a population characterized by older age, male gender and more proteinuria. The MDRD study formula and Cockcroft-Gault formula have greater accuracy and precision with true GFR, and this equation can be applied in subjects with healthy general population.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) provides the most accurate estimation of renal function. This study investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with impaired renal function having a normal serum creatinine level. We also validated whether the new Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula can be applied in a healthy general population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total 393 participants who had serum creatinine concentration below 132.6 micromol/L without underlying diseases were randomly selected on an address basis in Ansan City. According to the level of GFR, they were divided into 3 groups and we analyzed their clinical characteristics. In 75 subjects, who were randomly selected 25 cases in each group based on GFR estimated by Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) formula, true GFR was measured using the 99mTc-DTPA renal clearance method. RESULTS: A total 393 (male: 106, female: 287) participants were as follows: GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2; 4% (n = 25); 60 < or = GFR < 90 ml/min/1.73 m2; 26.2% (n = 103); GFR > or = 90 ml/min/1.73 m2; 67.4% (n = 265). In the group of decreased GFR, the mean age was older (67.4+/-10.7 vs. 48.7+/-12.8 vs. 39.4+/-8.2 years, p < 0.001), the gender was male (90.33+/-28.77 vs. 110.55+/-31.64, p < 0.001), and amount of proteinuria more increased (0.61 (0.56) vs. 0.33 (0.34) vs. 0.38 (0.33) gm/day, p = 0.007). The accuracy and precision of each formula were assessed by the difference in GFR measured by the 99mTc-DTPA renal clearance method--estimated GFR by each formula (deltaGFR), and the coefficient of determination (r2) of different predictive equations. The results were as follows: deltaGFR = -14.78+/-46.03, r2 = 0.79 (24-hour urinary creatinine clearance), deltaGFR=-16.79+/-57.32, r2 = 0.66 (100/serum creatinine), deltaGFR = 9.54+/-39.18, r2 = 0.87 (C-G formula), deltaGFR = -12.30+/-54.31, r2 = 0.66 (AASK formula), deltaGFR = 8.70+/-37.62, r2 = 0.79 (MDRD formula). Multiple linear regression analysis and logistic regression analysis showed that age, serum creatinine, total cholesterol and 24-hour urinary protein excretion were independently related to GFR and associated with a significant increase in the risk of decrement of GFR. CONCLUSIONS: From these results, a more accurate assessment of renal function should be required in a population characterized by older age, male gender and more proteinuria. The MDRD study formula and Cockcroft-Gault formula have greater accuracy and precision with true GFR, and this equation can be applied in subjects with healthy general population.
Authors: Sandra V Giannelli; Christophe E Graf; François R Herrmann; Jean-Pierre Michel; Kushang V Patel; Francesco Pizzarelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack Guralnik Journal: Rejuvenation Res Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 4.663
Authors: Virginia M Weaver; Nam-Soo Kim; Bernard G Jaar; Brian S Schwartz; Patrick J Parsons; Amy J Steuerwald; Andrew C Todd; David Simon; Byung-Kook Lee Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Sandra V Giannelli; Kushang V Patel; B Gwen Windham; Francesco Pizzarelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 5.562