A C Milne1, J Potter, A Avenell. 1. Health Services Research Unit (Foresterhill Lea), University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, Scotland, UK, AB25 2ZD. acmilne@hsru.abdn.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence for the effectiveness of nutritional supplements containing protein and energy, which are often prescribed for older people, is limited. Furthermore malnutrition is more common in this age group and deterioration of nutritional status can occur during illness. It is important to establish whether supplementing the diet is an effective way of improving outcomes for older people at risk from malnutrition. OBJECTIVES: This review examined the evidence from trials for improvement in nutritional status and clinical outcomes when extra protein and energy were provided, usually in the form of commercial 'sip-feeds'. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Healthstar, CINAHL, BIOSIS, CAB abstracts. We also hand searched nutrition journals and reference lists and contacted 'sip-feed' manufacturers. Date of most recent search: March 2004. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials of oral protein and energy supplementation in older people with the exception of groups recovering from cancer treatment or in critical care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trials prior to inclusion and independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Authors of trials were contacted for further information as necessary. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-nine trials with 4790 randomised participants have been included in the review. Most included trials had poor study quality. The pooled weighted mean difference [WMD] for percentage weight change showed a benefit of supplementation of 2.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9 to 2.7) from 34 trials. There was a reduced mortality in the supplemented compared with control groups (relative risk (RR) 0.74, CI 0.59 to 0.92) from 32 trials. The risk of complications from 14 trials showed no significant difference (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.11). Few trials were able to suggest any functional benefit from supplementation. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) for length of stay from 10 trials also showed no statistically significant effect (WMD -1.98 days, 95% CI -5.20 to 1.24). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation produces a small but consistent weight gain in older people. There may also be a beneficial effect on mortality. However, there was no evidence of improvement in clinical outcome, functional benefit or reduction in length of hospital stay with supplements. Additional data from large-scale multi-centre trials are still required.
BACKGROUND: Evidence for the effectiveness of nutritional supplements containing protein and energy, which are often prescribed for older people, is limited. Furthermore malnutrition is more common in this age group and deterioration of nutritional status can occur during illness. It is important to establish whether supplementing the diet is an effective way of improving outcomes for older people at risk from malnutrition. OBJECTIVES: This review examined the evidence from trials for improvement in nutritional status and clinical outcomes when extra protein and energy were provided, usually in the form of commercial 'sip-feeds'. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Healthstar, CINAHL, BIOSIS, CAB abstracts. We also hand searched nutrition journals and reference lists and contacted 'sip-feed' manufacturers. Date of most recent search: March 2004. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials of oral protein and energy supplementation in older people with the exception of groups recovering from cancer treatment or in critical care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trials prior to inclusion and independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Authors of trials were contacted for further information as necessary. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-nine trials with 4790 randomised participants have been included in the review. Most included trials had poor study quality. The pooled weighted mean difference [WMD] for percentage weight change showed a benefit of supplementation of 2.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9 to 2.7) from 34 trials. There was a reduced mortality in the supplemented compared with control groups (relative risk (RR) 0.74, CI 0.59 to 0.92) from 32 trials. The risk of complications from 14 trials showed no significant difference (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.11). Few trials were able to suggest any functional benefit from supplementation. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) for length of stay from 10 trials also showed no statistically significant effect (WMD -1.98 days, 95% CI -5.20 to 1.24). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation produces a small but consistent weight gain in older people. There may also be a beneficial effect on mortality. However, there was no evidence of improvement in clinical outcome, functional benefit or reduction in length of hospital stay with supplements. Additional data from large-scale multi-centre trials are still required.
Authors: G Abellan van Kan; G Gambassi; L C P G M de Groot; S Andrieu; T Cederholm; E André; J P Caubère; J P Bonjour; P Ritz; A Salva; A Sinclair; B Vellas; J Daydé; J Deregnaucourt; C Latgé Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2008 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: A Salva; L Coll-Planas; S Bruce; L De Groot; S Andrieu; G Abellan; B Vellas; Sandrine Andrieu; Luisa Bartorelli; Ytshal N Berner; Stuart Bruce; Bruno Corman; Alex Domingo; Thomas P Egger; Lisette de Groot; Yves Guigoz; Ana Imedio; Mercè Planas; Concha Porras; Joan Carles Rovira; Antoni Salvà; José Antonio Serra; Bruno Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Kala M Mehta; Edgar Pierluissi; W John Boscardin; Katharine A Kirby; Louise C Walter; Mary-Margaret Chren; Robert M Palmer; Steven R Counsell; C Seth Landefeld Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Patrick Jahn; Petra Renz; Joerg Stukenkemper; Katrin Book; Oliver Kuss; Karin Jordan; Ingrid Horn; Anette Thoke-Colberg; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Margarete Landenberger Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: R Visvanathan; C Piantadosi; K Lange; V Naganathan; P Hunter; I D Cameron; I Chapman Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Albert Westergren; Carolina Axelsson; Petra Lilja-Andersson; Christina Lindholm; Karin Petersson; Kerstin Ulander Journal: Food Nutr Res Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 3.894