Literature DB >> 15843631

Modulation of antisaccades by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field.

Bettina Olk1, Erik Chang, Alan Kingstone, Tony Ro.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the frontal eye field (FEF), which is involved with the inhibition and generation of saccades, is engaged to a different degree in pro- and antisaccades. Pro- and antisaccades are often assessed in separate experimental blocks. In such cases, saccade inhibition is required for antisaccades but not for prosaccades. To more directly assess the role of the FEF in saccade inhibition and generation, a new paradigm was used in which inhibition was necessary on pro- and antisaccade trials. Participants looked in the direction indicated by a target ('<' or '>') that appeared in the left or right visual field. When the pointing direction and the location were congruent, prosaccades were executed; otherwise antisaccades were required. Saccadic latencies were measured in blocks without and with single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the right FEF or a right posterior control site. Results showed that antisaccades generated into the hemifield ipsilateral to the TMS were significantly delayed after TMS over the FEF, but not the posterior control site. This result is interpreted in terms of a modulation of saccade inhibition to the contralateral visual field due to disruption of processing in the FEF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15843631     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  16 in total

1.  Input monitoring and response selection as components of executive control in pro-saccades and anti-saccades.

Authors:  André Vandierendonck; Maud Deschuyteneer; Ann Depoorter; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-08-19

Review 2.  Disorders of saccades.

Authors:  Matthew J Thurtell; Robert L Tomsak; R John Leigh
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of macaque frontal eye fields decreases saccadic reaction time.

Authors:  Annelies Gerits; Christian C Ruff; Olivier Guipponi; Nicole Wenderoth; Jon Driver; Wim Vanduffel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Comment on: Exp Brain Res. 2011 May 5th. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of macaque frontal eye fields decreases saccadic reaction time. Gerits A, Ruff CC, Guipponi O, Wenderoth N, Driver J, Vanduffel W.

Authors:  Pierre Pouget; Nicolas Wattiez; Antoni Valero-Cabre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Action video games and improved attentional control: Disentangling selection- and response-based processes.

Authors:  Joseph D Chisholm; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

6.  Impaired control of the oculomotor reflexes in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Martijn G van Koningsbruggen; Tom Pender; Liana Machado; Robert D Rafal
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Frontal non-invasive neurostimulation modulates antisaccade preparation in non-human primates.

Authors:  Antoni Valero-Cabre; Nicolas Wattiez; Morgane Monfort; Chantal François; Sophie Rivaud-Péchoux; Bertrand Gaymard; Pierre Pouget
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Frontal Eye Fields during Pro- and Antisaccade Tasks.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Neil Muggleton; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Role of the human supplementary eye field in the control of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Andrew Parton; Parashkev Nachev; Timothy L Hodgson; Dominic Mort; David Thomas; Roger Ordidge; Paul S Morgan; Stephen Jackson; Geraint Rees; Masud Husain
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Distributed representations of the "preparatory set" in the frontal oculomotor system: a TMS study.

Authors:  M Nagel; A Sprenger; R Lencer; D Kömpf; H Siebner; W Heide
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.