Literature DB >> 15843483

Cross-orientation suppression: monoptic and dichoptic mechanisms are different.

Baowang Li1, Matthew R Peterson, Jeffrey K Thompson, Thang Duong, Ralph D Freeman.   

Abstract

The response of a cell in the primary visual cortex to an optimally oriented grating is suppressed by a superimposed orthogonal grating. This cross-orientation suppression (COS) is exhibited when the orthogonal and optimal stimuli are presented to the same eye (monoptically) or to different eyes (dichoptically). A recent study suggested that monoptic COS arises from subcortical processes; however, the mechanisms underlying dichoptic COS were not addressed. We have compared the temporal frequency tuning and stimulus adaptation properties of monoptic and dichoptic COS. We found that dichoptic COS is best elicited with lower temporal frequencies and is substantially reduced after prolonged adaptation to a mask grating. In contrast, monoptic COS is more pronounced with mask gratings at much higher temporal frequencies and is less prone to stimulus adaptation. These results suggest that monoptic COS is mediated by subcortical mechanisms, whereas intracortical inhibition is the mechanism for dichoptic COS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15843483     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00203.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; David J Holmes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  BOLD and spiking activity.

Authors:  Yuval Nir; Ilan Dinstein; Rafael Malach; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Neurometabolic coupling differs for suppression within and beyond the classical receptive field in visual cortex.

Authors:  Baowang Li; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Attention model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; James Rankin; John Rinzel; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Temporal Contingencies Determine Whether Adaptation Strengthens or Weakens Normalization.

Authors:  Amir Aschner; Samuel G Solomon; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Hansem Sohn; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The divisive normalization model of V1 neurons: a comprehensive comparison of physiological data and model predictions.

Authors:  Tadamasa Sawada; Alexander A Petrov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Contrast Normalization Accounts for Binocular Interactions in Human Striate and Extra-striate Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Spero C Nicholas; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Orientation bandwidths are invariant across spatiotemporal frequency after isotropic components are removed.

Authors:  John Cass; Sjoerd Stuit; Peter Bex; David Alais
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Temporal whitening: transient noise perceptually equalizes the 1/f temporal amplitude spectrum.

Authors:  John Cass; David Alais; Branka Spehar; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.