Literature DB >> 15843482

Delay-period activity in visual, visuomovement, and movement neurons in the frontal eye field.

Bonnie M Lawrence1, Robert L White, Lawrence H Snyder.   

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the role of frontal eye field neurons in the maintenance of spatial information in a delayed-saccade paradigm. We found that visual, visuomovement, and movement neurons conveyed roughly equal amounts of spatial information during the delay period. Although there was significant delay-period activity in individual movement neurons, there was no significant delay-period activity in the averaged population of movement neurons. These contradictory results were reconciled by the finding that the population of movement neurons with memory activity consisted of two subclasses of neurons, the combination of which resulted in the cancellation of delay-period activity in the population of movement neurons. One subclass consisted of neurons with significantly greater delay activity in the preferred than in the null direction ("canonical"), whereas the other subclass consisted of neurons with significantly greater delay activity in the null direction than in the preferred direction ("paradoxical"). Preferred direction was defined by the saccade direction that evoked the greatest movement-related activity. Interestingly, the peak saccade-related activity of canonical neurons occurred before the onset of the saccade, whereas the peak saccade-related activity of paradoxical neurons occurred after the onset of the saccade. This suggests that the former, but not the latter, are directly involved in triggering saccades. We speculate that paradoxical neurons provide a mechanism by which spatial information can be maintained in a saccade-generating circuit without prematurely triggering a saccade.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15843482     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00214.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  18 in total

1.  Saccade preparation signals in the human frontal and parietal cortices.

Authors:  Clayton E Curtis; Jason D Connolly
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Cognitively directed spatial selection in the frontal eye field in anticipation of visual stimuli to be discriminated.

Authors:  Hui-Hui Zhou; Kirk G Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Prefrontal Contributions to Attention and Working Memory.

Authors:  Zahra Bahmani; Kelsey Clark; Yaser Merrikhi; Adrienne Mueller; Warren Pettine; M Isabel Vanegas; Tirin Moore; Behrad Noudoost
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019

4.  Ghosts in the Machine II: Neural Correlates of Memory Interference from the Previous Trial.

Authors:  Charalampos Papadimitriou; Robert L White; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Similar prevalence and magnitude of auditory-evoked and visually evoked activity in the frontal eye fields: implications for multisensory motor control.

Authors:  Valeria C Caruso; Daniel S Pages; Marc A Sommer; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Dynamic shifts of visual and saccadic signals in prefrontal cortical regions 8Ar and FEF.

Authors:  Sanjeev B Khanna; Jonathan A Scott; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Persistent spatial information in the FEF during object-based short-term memory does not contribute to task performance.

Authors:  Kelsey L Clark; Behrad Noudoost; Tirin Moore
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Distinct Sources of Variability Affect Eye Movement Preparation.

Authors:  Sanjeev B Khanna; Adam C Snyder; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The responses of visual neurons in the frontal eye field are biased for saccades.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Working Memory and Decision-Making in a Frontoparietal Circuit Model.

Authors:  John D Murray; Jorge Jaramillo; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.