Helen Lester1, Jonathan Q Tritter, Helen Sorohan. 1. Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT. H.E.Lester@bham.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the experience of providing and receiving primary care from the perspectives of primary care health professionals and patients with serious mental illness respectively. DESIGN: Qualitative study consisting of six patient groups, six health professional groups, and six combined focus groups. SETTING: Six primary care trusts in the West Midlands. PARTICIPANTS: Forty five patients with serious mental illness, 39 general practitioners (GPs), and eight practice nurses. RESULTS: Most health professionals felt that the care of people with serious mental illness was too specialised for primary care. However, most patients viewed primary care as the cornerstone of their health care and preferred to consult their own GP, who listened and was willing to learn, rather than be referred to a different GP with specific mental health knowledge. Swift access was important to patients, with barriers created by the effects of the illness and the noisy or crowded waiting area. Some patients described how they exaggerated symptoms ("acted up") to negotiate an urgent appointment, a strategy that was also employed by some GPs to facilitate admission to secondary care. Most participants felt that structured reviews of care had value. However, whereas health professionals perceived serious mental illness as a lifelong condition, patients emphasised the importance of optimism in treatment and hope for recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care is of central importance to people with serious mental illness. The challenge for health professionals and patients is to create a system in which patients can see a health professional when they want to without needing to exaggerate their symptoms. The importance that patients attach to optimism in treatment, continuity of care, and listening skills compared with specific mental health knowledge should encourage health professionals in primary care to play a greater role in the care of patients with serious mental illness.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the experience of providing and receiving primary care from the perspectives of primary care health professionals and patients with serious mental illness respectively. DESIGN: Qualitative study consisting of six patient groups, six health professional groups, and six combined focus groups. SETTING: Six primary care trusts in the West Midlands. PARTICIPANTS: Forty five patients with serious mental illness, 39 general practitioners (GPs), and eight practice nurses. RESULTS: Most health professionals felt that the care of people with serious mental illness was too specialised for primary care. However, most patients viewed primary care as the cornerstone of their health care and preferred to consult their own GP, who listened and was willing to learn, rather than be referred to a different GP with specific mental health knowledge. Swift access was important to patients, with barriers created by the effects of the illness and the noisy or crowded waiting area. Some patients described how they exaggerated symptoms ("acted up") to negotiate an urgent appointment, a strategy that was also employed by some GPs to facilitate admission to secondary care. Most participants felt that structured reviews of care had value. However, whereas health professionals perceived serious mental illness as a lifelong condition, patients emphasised the importance of optimism in treatment and hope for recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care is of central importance to people with serious mental illness. The challenge for health professionals and patients is to create a system in which patients can see a health professional when they want to without needing to exaggerate their symptoms. The importance that patients attach to optimism in treatment, continuity of care, and listening skills compared with specific mental health knowledge should encourage health professionals in primary care to play a greater role in the care of patients with serious mental illness.
Authors: G Harrison; K Hopper; T Craig; E Laska; C Siegel; J Wanderling; K C Dube; K Ganev; R Giel; W an der Heiden; S K Holmberg; A Janca; P W Lee; C A León; S Malhotra; A J Marsella; Y Nakane; N Sartorius; Y Shen; C Skoda; R Thara; S J Tsirkin; V K Varma; D Walsh; D Wiersma Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: J Bindman; S Johnson; S Wright; G Szmukler; P Bebbington; E Kuipers; G Thornicroft Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Helen Lester; Nagina Khan; Peter Jones; Max Marshall; David Fowler; Tim Amos; Max Birchwood Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Vimal K Sharma; Peter Lepping; Murali Krishna; Shazia Durrani; John R M Copeland; Patricia Mottram; Rashmi Parhee; Bennett Quinn; Steven Lane; Anthony Cummins Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Benjamin G Druss; Silke A von Esenwein; Michael T Compton; Kimberly J Rask; Liping Zhao; Ruth M Parker Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 18.112