Literature DB >> 15842980

Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography.

Emilio Chiurlia1, Mila Menozzi, Carlo Ratti, Renato Romagnoli, Maria Grazia Modena.   

Abstract

Fifty-two consecutive asymptomatic patients with a total of 166 bypass grafts were investigated by 16-slice computed tomography (CT) 15 +/- 5 days before invasive coronary angiography. Overall, 165 grafts (99.4%) were assessable with multislice CT (MSCT). Coronary angiography showed that 111 grafts (67%) were patent and 54 (33%) were occluded. Of the patent grafts, 22 had high-grade stenoses. MSCT correctly classified 111 grafts as patent and 54 as occluded. Of the patent grafts, 16-slice CT correctly detected 21 bypass stenoses (95%). These results yielded 100% sensitivity and specificity of 16-slice CT for detecting bypass grafts occlusion and 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity for detecting high-grade stenoses in patent grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15842980     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of post-coronary artery bypass grafts in correlation with invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Rajani Gorantla; J S N Murthy; T R Muralidharan; Rupesh Mandava; Bhawna Dev; Harsha Chandaga; R Rajeswaran; J D Roy Santosham; Santhosh Joseph
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012 May-Jun

2.  Non-invasive coronary angiography using multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Schussler; Paul A Grayburn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Cardiac CT: coronary arteries and beyond.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Transitioning from 16-slice to 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: are we really making progress?

Authors:  Razi Khan; Sapna Rawal; Mark J Eisenberg
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Current and future status on cardiac computed tomography imaging for diagnosis and risk stratification.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of 16- versus 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts: a comparative study.

Authors:  Levent Şahiner; Ugur Canpolat; Kudret Aytemir; Tuncay Hazirolan; Hikmet Yorgun; Ergün Bariş Kaya; Ali Oto
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-25

Review 7.  Cardiac CT: atherosclerosis to acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Ravi Kiran Munnur; James D Cameron; Brian S Ko; Ian T Meredith; Dennis T L Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-12

Review 8.  Coronary artery bypass grafts and MDCT imaging: what to know and what to look for.

Authors:  Riccardo Marano; Carlo Liguori; Pierluigi Rinaldi; Maria Luigia Storto; Marco Angelo Politi; Giancarlo Savino; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Quality control after total arterial revascularisation: multislice computer tomography cannot replace coronary angiography.

Authors:  Malakh Shrestha; Nawid Khaladj; Christoph Bara; Jürgen Weidemann; Michael Maringka; Ruoyu Zhang; Axel Haverich; Christian Hagl
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Midterm follow-up of patients receiving radial artery as coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector-row CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  F Crusco; A Antoniella; V Papa; R Menzano; D Di Lazzaro; G Di Manici; T Ragni; A Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 6.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.