Literature DB >> 17563850

Midterm follow-up of patients receiving radial artery as coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector-row CT coronary angiography.

F Crusco1, A Antoniella, V Papa, R Menzano, D Di Lazzaro, G Di Manici, T Ragni, A Giovagnoni.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study was undertaken to evaluate the 3-year outcome of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) involving the use of the radial artery (RA) in comparison with the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and saphenous vein (SV) grafts by using 16-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients underwent electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated 16-MDCT 32+/-4 months after surgery. A total of 50 LIMA grafts, 55 SV grafts and 51 RA grafts were studied. Approximately 68.6% or RAs were free, 21.5% sequential and 9.8% composite. Grade 0 was defined as complete patency, grade 1 as focal stenosis (>70%) and grade 2 as graft occlusion. The Fisher exact test was used to analyse variables (p<0.05 significant). Concordance between readers for the detection of patency was calculated by the kappa-value.
RESULTS: LIMA had the best patency rate (94.0%), followed by SV (83.6%) and RA (74.5%). Regarding RA, the patency rate by territory was 79.4% in the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX), 72.7% in the left anterior descending (LAD) and 50% in the right coronary artery (RCA); the occlusion rate was 20.0% among free grafts, 18.2% among sequential grafts and 20.0% among composite grafts. The kappa-value was 0.86.
CONCLUSIONS: Sixteen-slice MDCT scanners enable accurate analysis of CABG status and are a useful noninvasive diagnostic tool for midterm clinical follow-up of patients who have undergone CABG involving the use of RA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17563850     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-007-0160-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   6.313


  34 in total

1.  A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts.

Authors:  Nimesh D Desai; Eric A Cohen; C David Naylor; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Visualisation of non-invasive coronary bypass imaging: 4-row vs. 16-row multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  M Fawad Khan; Christopher Herzog; Kai Landenberger; Adel Maataoui; Sven Martens; Hanns Ackermann; Anton Moritz; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radial-artery coronary bypass grafts.

Authors:  Umesh N Khot; Daniel T Friedman; Stephen G Ellis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Radial-artery coronary bypass grafts.

Authors:  Alberto Montoli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparative anatomy and histology of the radial artery and the internal thoracic artery. Implication for coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  C Acar; V A Jebara; M Portoghèse; F Fontaliran; P Dervanian; J C Chachques; V Meininger; A Carpentier
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years.

Authors:  G M Fitzgibbon; H P Kafka; A J Leach; W J Keon; G D Hooper; J R Burton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Postoperative radial artery angiography for coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  A G Royse; C F Royse; J Tatoulis; L E Grigg; P Shah; D Hunt; N Better; S F Marasco
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 8.  CT of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  U Joseph Schoepf; Christoph R Becker; Bernd M Ohnesorge; E Kent Yucel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Incremental prognostic value of exercise thallium-201 myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography late after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  W Palmas; S Bingham; G A Diamond; T A Denton; H Kiat; J D Friedman; D Scarlata; J Maddahi; I Cohen; D S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Coronary revascularization with the radial artery: new interest for an old conduit.

Authors:  A M Calafiore; G Teodori; G Di Giammarco; E D'Annunzio; R Angelini; G Vitolla; N Maddestra
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.620

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prognostic outcome of routine clinical noninvasive multidetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  L La Grutta; G Runza; G Gentile; E Russo; G Lo Re; M Galia; T V Bartolotta; V Alaimo; R Malagò; F Cademartiri; A E Cardinale; M Midiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Graft pathology at the time of harvest: impact on long-term survival.

Authors:  Shi-Min Yuan; Yun Li; Yan Hong Ben; Xiao Feng Cheng; Da Zhu Li; De Min Li; Hua Jing
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

3.  Mid-Term Patency in Radial Artery and Saphenous Vein After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Asymptomatic Patients Using 128-Slice CT Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Ali Sadeghpour; Hamidreza Pouraliakbar; Rasoul Azarfarin; Alireza Alizadeh Ghavidel; Somayeh Zavareian; Ali Amirahmadi
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.