Literature DB >> 15842744

The direction-selective contrast response of area 18 neurons is different for first- and second-order motion.

Timothy Ledgeway1, Chang'an Zhan, Aaron P Johnson, Yuning Song, Curtis L Baker.   

Abstract

Cortical neurons selective for the direction of motion often exhibit some limited response to motion in their nonpreferred directions. Here we examine the dependence of neuronal direction selectivity on stimulus contrast, both for first-order (luminance-modulated, sine-wave grating) and second-order (contrast-modulated envelope) stimuli. We measured responses from single neurons in area 18 of cat visual cortex to both kinds of moving stimuli over a wide range of contrasts (1.25-80%). Direction-selective contrast response functions (CRFs) were calculated as the preferred-minus-null difference in average firing frequency as a function of contrast. We also applied receiver operating characteristic analysis to our CRF data to obtain neurometric functions characterizing the potential ability of each neuron to discriminate motion direction at each contrast level tested. CRFs for sine-wave gratings were usually monotonic; however, a substantial minority of neurons (35%) exhibited nonmonotonic CRFs (such that the degree of direction selectivity decreased with increasing contrast). The underlying preferred and nonpreferred direction CRFs were diverse, often having different shapes in a given neuron. Neurometric functions for direction discrimination showed a similar degree of heterogeneity, including instances of nonmonotonicity. For contrast-modulated stimuli, however, CRFs for either carrier or envelope contrast were always monotonic. In a given neuron, neurometric thresholds were typically much higher for second- than for first-order stimuli. These results demonstrate that the degree of a cell's direction selectivity depends on the contrast at which it is measured, and therefore is not a characteristic parameter of a neuron. In general, contrast response functions for first-order stimuli were very heterogeneous in shape and sensitivity, while those for second-order stimuli showed less sensitivity and were quite stereotyped in shape.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15842744     DOI: 10.1017/S0952523805221120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  11 in total

1.  Contrast affects speed tuning, space-time slant, and receptive-field organization of simple cells in macaque V1.

Authors:  Margaret S Livingstone; Bevil R Conway
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Decoding working memory of stimulus contrast in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Yue Xing; Tim Ledgeway; Paul V McGraw; Denis Schluppeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Selective tuning for contrast in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Ilaria Sani; Elisa Santandrea; Ashkan Golzar; Maria Concetta Morrone; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Temporally evolving gain mechanisms of attention in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Ilaria Sani; Elisa Santandrea; Maria Concetta Morrone; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Direction-selective patterns of activity in human visual cortex suggest common neural substrates for different types of motion.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Frank Tong; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Contrast response functions in the visual wulst of the alert burrowing owl: a single-unit study.

Authors:  Pedro Gabrielle Vieira; João Paulo Machado de Sousa; Jerome Baron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Analysis of the stabilized supralinear network.

Authors:  Yashar Ahmadian; Daniel B Rubin; Kenneth D Miller
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Contrast-dependent orientation discrimination in the mouse.

Authors:  Minghai Long; Weiqian Jiang; Dechen Liu; Haishan Yao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The potential importance of saturating and supersaturating contrast response functions in visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Declined contrast sensitivity of neurons along the visual pathway in aging cats.

Authors:  Zhengchun Wang; Zhimo Yao; Nini Yuan; Zhen Liang; Guangxing Li; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.