Literature DB >> 15841823

Asymmetric bias in perception of facial affect among Roman and Arabic script readers.

Robin L Heath1, Aida Rouhana, Dana Abi Ghanem.   

Abstract

The asymmetric chimeric faces test is used frequently as an indicator of right hemisphere involvement in the perception of facial affect, as the test is considered free of linguistic elements. Much of the original research with the asymmetric chimeric faces test was conducted with subjects reading left-to-right Roman script, i.e., English. As readers of right-to-left scripts, such as Arabic, demonstrated a mixed or weak rightward bias in judgements of facial affect, the influence of habitual scanning direction was thought to intersect with laterality. We administered the asymmetric chimeric faces test to 1239 adults who represented a range of script experience, i.e., Roman script readers (English and French), Arabic readers, bidirectional readers of Roman and Arabic scripts, and illiterates. Our findings supported the hypothesis that the bias in facial affect judgement is rooted in laterality, but can be influenced by script direction. Specifically, right-handed readers of Roman script demonstrated the greatest mean leftward score, and mixed-handed Arabic script readers demonstrated the greatest mean rightward score. Biliterates showed a gradual shift in asymmetric perception, as their scores fell between those of Roman and Arabic script readers, basically distributed in the order expected by their handedness and most often used script. Illiterates, whose only directional influence was laterality, showed a slight leftward bias.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15841823     DOI: 10.1080/13576500342000293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laterality        ISSN: 1357-650X


  8 in total

1.  Consistent left gaze bias in processing different facial cues.

Authors:  Kun Guo; Claire Smith; Kathryn Powell; Kelly Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-11

2.  The perception of strabismus by children and adults.

Authors:  Stefania Margherita Mojon-Azzi; Andrea Kunz; Daniel Stéphane Mojon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Alcohol attention bias in adolescent social drinkers: an eye tracking study.

Authors:  Annie Melaugh McAteer; David Curran; Donncha Hanna
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Task demands modulate decision and eye movement responses in the chimeric face test: examining the right hemisphere processing account.

Authors:  Jason C Coronel; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-20

5.  Modifications of Visual Field Asymmetries for Face Categorization in Early Deaf Adults: A Study With Chimeric Faces.

Authors:  Marjorie Dole; David Méary; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-20

6.  Looking (for) patterns: Similarities and differences between infant and adult free scene-viewing patterns.

Authors:  Daan R van Renswoude; Maartje E J Raijmakers; Ingmar Visser
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 0.957

7.  Perceptual asymmetries and handedness: a neglected link?

Authors:  Daniele Marzoli; Giulia Prete; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-28

8.  Spatial location in brief, free-viewing face encoding modulates contextual face recognition.

Authors:  Fatima M Felisberti; Mark R McDermott
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-07-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.