Literature DB >> 1584117

A pencil beam model for photon dose calculation.

A Ahnesjö1, M Saxner, A Trepp.   

Abstract

A method for photon dose calculation in radio therapy planning using pencil beam energy deposition kernels is presented. It is designed to meet the requirements of an algorithm for 3-D treatment planning that is general enough to handle irregularly shaped radiation fields incident on a heterogeneous patient. It is point oriented and thus faster than a full 3-D convolution algorithm and uses the same physical data base to characterize a clinical beam as a full 3-D convolution algorithm. It is shown that photon therapy beams can be characterized with great accuracy from a combination of precalculated Monte Carlo energy deposition kernels and dose distributions measured in a water phantom. The data are used to derive analytical pencil beam kernels that are approximately partitionated into the dose from (i) primary released electrons and positrons, (ii) scattered, bremsstrahlung, and annihilation photons, (iii) contaminating photons, and (iv) charged particles from the collimator head. A semianalytical integration method, based on triangulation of the field, is developed for dose calculation using the analytical kernels. Dose is calculated in units normalized to the incident energy fluence which facilitates output factor calculation. For application in heterogeneous media, a scatter correction factor is derived using monodirectional convolution along the ray path. In homogeneous media results are compared with measurements and in heterogeneous media with Monte Carlo calculations and the Batho method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1584117     DOI: 10.1118/1.596856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  33 in total

1.  A novel reduced-order prioritized optimization method for radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Georgios Kalantzis; Aditya Apte
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 2.  Impact of dose calculation algorithm on radiation therapy.

Authors:  Wen-Zhou Chen; Ying Xiao; Jun Li
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28

3.  Calculation of the entrance skin dose distribution for fluoroscopically guided interventions using a pencil beam backscatter model.

Authors:  Sarath Vijayan; Zhenyu Xiong; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-14

Review 4.  Emerging role of MRI in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Hesheng Wang; R H N Tijssen; Indra J Das
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  The accuracy of treatment planning system dose modelling in the presence of brass mesh bolus.

Authors:  Neil Richmond
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-07-22

6.  VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT in head and neck cancer: a comparative plan analysis.

Authors:  Rolf Wiehle; Stefan Knippen; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Gregor Bruggmoser; Norbert Hodapp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Experimental validation of deterministic Acuros XB algorithm for IMRT and VMAT dose calculations with the Radiological Physics Center's head and neck phantom.

Authors:  Tao Han; Firas Mourtada; Kelly Kisling; Justin Mikell; David Followill; Rebecca Howell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Multicriteria optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic head.

Authors:  Theodore S Hong; David L Craft; Fredrik Carlsson; Thomas R Bortfeld
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): dosimetric comparison and clinical implications.

Authors:  Leire Arbea; Luis Isaac Ramos; Rafael Martínez-Monge; Marta Moreno; Javier Aristu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Clinical relevance of different dose calculation strategies for mediastinal IMRT in Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  J Koeck; Y Abo-Madyan; H T Eich; F Stieler; J Fleckenstein; J Kriz; R-P Mueller; F Wenz; F Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.