Literature DB >> 15839870

Quality of life assessment in laryngectomized individuals: do we need additions to standard questionnaires in specific clinical research projects?

B M R Op de Coul1, A H Ackerstaff, C J van As, F J A van den Hoogen, C A Meeuwis, J J Manni, F J M Hilgers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess, whether the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 give enough detailed information to study specific quality of life (QoL) related issues in laryngectomized individuals.
DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective clinical trial; baseline measurement with EORTC questionnaires and an additional questionnaire, focusing on specific postlaryngectomy problems.
SETTING: Head and Neck Department of one Comprehensive Cancer Center and three Academic Medical Hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty laryngectomized individuals, selected to participate in a prospective clinical trial on hands-free tracheoesophageal speech. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Comparison of QoL dimensions, as assessed with the standard EORTC questionnaires, with the information obtained with additional questions, aimed at discovering in more detail, e.g. voice and respiratory problems in laryngectomized individuals.
RESULTS: Based on the EORTC QoL questionnaires a good overall and voice specific QoL-level was found. However, the additional questionnaire showed that especially concerning voice and respiration more specific information was obtained. For example, despite an overall satisfaction with many aspects of the voice in more than three-quarters of the patients, speaking in a noisy environment was reported by 63% of the patients as being a serious problem, and a significant relation could be established between pulmonary and voicing problems (r = 0.28, P < 0.05), something also undetectable with the EORTC questionnaires.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings underline the necessity to develop and use more specific additional questionnaires as an adjunct to the existing EORTC questionnaires, when studying specific symptoms in laryngectomized individuals, especially in order to detect intervention related changes over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15839870     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00932.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  16 in total

Review 1.  Speech and swallowing after surgical treatment of advanced oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Anne Marijn Kreeft; Lisette van der Molen; Frans J Hilgers; Alfons J Balm
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Hands-free speech after surgical voice rehabilitation with a Provox voice prosthesis: experience with the Provox FreeHands HME tracheostoma valve system.

Authors:  K J Lorenz; K Groll; A H Ackerstaff; F J M Hilgers; H Maier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The Effect of Noise on Relationships Between Speech Intelligibility and Self-Reported Communication Measures in Tracheoesophageal Speakers.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Devon Sawin Otero; Susan Bolt; Mara Kapsner-Smith; Jessica R Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Outcome of transoral robotic surgery for stage I-II oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  J W L van Loon; L E Smeele; F J M Hilgers; M W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The relationship between communicative participation and postlaryngectomy speech outcomes.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Devon Otero; Steven Cox; Jordan Johnson; Carolyn R Baylor; Kathryn M Yorkston; Philip C Doyle
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Social withdrawal after laryngectomy.

Authors:  Helge Danker; Dorit Wollbrück; Susanne Singer; Michael Fuchs; Elmar Brähler; Alexandra Meyer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Does lack of glottic closure affect quality of life as a cause of constipation in laryngectomized patients?

Authors:  Seher Sirin Ugur; Sancak Yuksel; Berna Uslu Coskun; Burhan Dadas; Goktug Sirin; Adin Selcuk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Auditory-perceptual speech outcomes and quality of life after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Adam M B Day; Devon E Sawin; Kristin Lamvik; Philip C Doyle
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Effects of total laryngectomy on olfactory function, health-related quality of life, and communication: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Birgit Risberg-Berlin; Anna Rydén; Riitta Ylitalo Möller; Caterina Finizia
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2009-07-29

10.  Pretreatment organ function in patients with advanced head and neck cancer: clinical outcome measures and patients' views.

Authors:  Lisette van der Molen; Maya A van Rossum; Annemieke H Ackerstaff; Ludi E Smeele; Coen R N Rasch; Frans J M Hilgers
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2009-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.