Literature DB >> 1583940

Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings. The clinician's point of view. The Dartmouth Primary Care COOP Project.

J Wasson1, A Keller, L Rubenstein, R Hays, E Nelson, D Johnson.   

Abstract

In the past decade physicians have identified the need to expand patient assessment to include global function and quality of life. During the same period, the busy clinic has evolved into the location where this assessment seems most appropriate. Integrating functional health assessment into a busy clinical practice is difficult because the necessary steps require time, thought, recording, and follow-up. Attention to the office ecosystem is very important before any patient care management method is introduced. The clinician must transform the results of health status screening into a specific functional diagnosis. The clinician has to understand the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the measure for a preliminary diagnosis to be made. Often, additional measurements must be taken to establish a specific diagnosis. These steps encompass assessment linkage. Once the specific cause for the dysfunction is recognized, the clinician then has to determine the need for special resources. This is called the resource linkage. By following the steps outlined in this paper, the clinician should be able to overcome many obstacles for functional health status assessment in busy ambulatory settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1583940     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  29 in total

Review 1.  A review of health-related quality-of-life measures in stroke.

Authors:  B A Golomb; B G Vickrey; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Oncologists' use of quality of life information: results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians.

Authors:  A Bezjak; P Ng; R Skeel; A D Depetrillo; R Comis; K M Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Development of the Short Form Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire: the EHP-5.

Authors:  Georgina Jones; Crispin Jenkinson; Stephen Kennedy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  A pragmatic defence of health status measures.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-11

5.  Chemical intolerance in primary care settings: prevalence, comorbidity, and outcomes.

Authors:  David A Katerndahl; Iris R Bell; Raymond F Palmer; Claudia S Miller
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Managed care and chronic illness: health services research needs.

Authors:  E H Wagner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Barriers to initiating depression treatment in primary care practice.

Authors:  Paul A Nutting; Kathryn Rost; Miriam Dickinson; James J Werner; Perry Dickinson; Jeffrey L Smith; Beth Gallovic
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Validation of the care notebook for measuring physical, mental and life well-being of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Kunihiko Kobayashi; Joseph Green; Mari Shimonagayoshi; Noriaki Kanemoto; Ryo Kasai; Yoichi Itoh; Yuki Fujiki; Yasuo Ohashi; Carolyn Gotay; Shoji Kudoh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; D Murray; A Carr
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-06

10.  Quality of life among patients with epilepsy in Nigeria: predictors and barriers to routine clinical use of QOLIE-31.

Authors:  Temitope Ogundare; Timothy O Adebowale; Obinna A Okonkwo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.