Literature DB >> 15837996

Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

David G Warr1, Paul J Hesketh, Richard J Gralla, Hyman B Muss, Jørn Herrstedt, Peter D Eisenberg, Harry Raftopoulos, Steven M Grunberg, Munir Gabriel, Anthony Rodgers, Norman Bohidar, George Klinger, Carolyn M Hustad, Kevin J Horgan, Franck Skobieranda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This is the first study in which the NK(1)-receptor antagonist, aprepitant (APR), was evaluated for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible breast cancer patients were naive to emetogenic chemotherapy and treated with cyclophosphamide +/- doxorubicin or epirubicin. Patients were randomly assigned to either an aprepitant regimen (day 1, APR 125 mg, ondansetron (OND) 8 mg, and dexamethasone 12 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, APR 80 qd) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] or a control regimen (day 1, OND 8 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, OND 8 mg bid). Data on nausea, vomiting, and use of rescue medication were collected with a self-report diary. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with complete response, defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy, during 120 hours after initiation of chemotherapy in cycle 1. The secondary end point was the proportion of patients with an average item score higher than 6 of 7 on the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire.
RESULTS: Of 866 patients randomized, 857 patients (99%) were assessable. Overall complete response was greater with the aprepitant regimen than with the control regimen (50.8% v 42.5%; P = .015). More patients in the aprepitant group reported minimal or no impact of CINV on daily life (63.5% v 55.6%; P = .019). Both treatments were generally well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: The aprepitant regimen was more effective than the control regimen for prevention of CINV in patients receiving both an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15837996     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  155 in total

1.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of antiemetic prophylaxis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jesús García Gómez; M Eva Pérez López; Jesús García Mata; Dolores Isla Casado
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: pathophysiology and therapeutic principles.

Authors:  Juan Bayo; Paula J Fonseca; Susana Hernando; S Servitja; A Calvo; S Falagan; Estefanía García; Iria González; María José de Miguel; Quionia Pérez; Ana Milena; Antonio Ruiz; Agustí Barnadas
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Acute emesis: moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jørn Herrstedt; Bernardo Rapoport; David Warr; Fausto Roila; Emilio Bria; Cynthia Rittenberg; Paul J Hesketh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Aprepitant for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Takako Inoue; Madoka Kimura; Junji Uchida; Kazumi Nishino; Toru Kumagai; Junko Taniguchi; Fumio Imamura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Evaluation of new antiemetic agents and definition of antineoplastic agent emetogenicity--state of the art.

Authors:  Steven M Grunberg; David Warr; Richard J Gralla; Bernardo L Rapoport; Paul J Hesketh; Karin Jordan; Birgitte T Espersen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Palonosetron exhibits higher total control rate compared to first-generation serotonin antagonists and improves appetite in delayed-phase chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Hiroki Ueda; Chigusa Shimono; Tomoyasu Nishimura; Megumi Shimamoto; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20

8.  Aprepitant and granisetron for the prophylaxis of radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting after moderately emetogenic radiotherapy for bone metastases: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  K Dennis; C De Angelis; F Jon; N Lauzon; M Pasetka; L Holden; E Barnes; C Danjoux; A Sahgal; M Tsao; E Chow
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Polymorphisms in the novel serotonin receptor subunit gene HTR3C show different risks for acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting after anthracycline chemotherapy.

Authors:  P A Fasching; B Kollmannsberger; P L Strissel; B Niesler; J Engel; H Kreis; M P Lux; S Weihbrecht; B Lausen; M R Bani; M W Beckmann; R Strick
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting During Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Karen M Mustian; Katie Devine; Julie L Ryan; Michelle C Janelsins; Lisa K Sprod; Luke J Peppone; Grace D Candelario; Supriya G Mohile; Gary R Morrow
Journal:  US Oncol Hematol       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.