Literature DB >> 15837439

An assessment of willingness to participate in a randomized trial of arthroscopic knee surgery in patients with osteoarthritis.

Alisha H Creel1, Elena Losina, Lisa A Mandl, Robert J Marx, Nizar N Mahomed, Scott D Martin, Tamara L Martin, Peter J Millett, Anne H Fossel, Jeffrey N Katz.   

Abstract

Identifying barriers to recruitment into a randomized clinical trial can help researchers adjust recruitment strategies to maximize enrollment. To determine barriers to enrollment of patients in trials of knee osteoarthritis treatments, we recruited from three centers patients over age 45 who had both knee osteoarthritis and a meniscal tear. We described a hypothetical randomized trial of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus non-operative management and assessed patients' willingness to participate in such a trial. We elicited preferences for treatment along with information on age, sex, education level, race, work status, and pain. We examined the association between these factors and willingness to participate in the trial. Orthopedic surgeons identified 106 eligible osteoarthritis patients, of whom 12 could not be reached, 6 refused and 88 (83%) completed interviews. 63% were female, 55% were college graduates, 23% were non-white and mean age was 60+/-8. The mean WOMAC pain score was 56+/-23. 22% of patients stated that they were definitely willing to participate in the hypothetical trial, and 24% stated they were probably willing. Subjects lacking strong preferences for treatment stated a greater willingness to participate than those with strong preferences (36-14% definitely willing, chi(2) for trend, p=0.005). WOMAC pain score, age, education, work status and race were not associated with willingness to participate. Males were more likely than females to state a willingness to participate (39-11% definitely willing, p=0.005). Since OA affects females disproportionately, a better understanding of barriers to females' participation in trials may enhance future research on treatment of osteoarthritis. Effectively addressing a priori treatment preferences through patient education about the advantages and drawbacks of treatments may increase willingness to participate in trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15837439     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  21 in total

Review 1.  Clinical trials in orthopaedics research. Part II. Prioritization for randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; James G Wright; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Can we predict response to the McKenzie method in patients with acute low back pain? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Charles Sheets; Luciana A C Machado; Mark Hancock; Chris Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Design and conduct of clinical trials of surgical interventions for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J N Katz; E Losina; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Choosing surgery: patients' preferences within a trial of treatments for anterior cruciate ligament injury. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Carina A Thorstensson; L Stefan Lohmander; Richard B Frobell; Ewa M Roos; Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Conducting a clinical study: A guide for good research practice.

Authors:  Rudolf W Poolman; Beate Hanson; Rene K Marti; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Preference assessment of recruitment into a randomized trial for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Vani Sabesan; Stuart L Weinstein; Kevin F Spratt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The MeTeOR trial (Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research): rationale and design features.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Christine E Chaisson; Brian Cole; Ali Guermazi; David J Hunter; Morgan Jones; Bruce A Levy; Lisa A Mandl; Scott Martin; Robert G Marx; Clare Safran-Norton; Frank W Roemer; Debra Skoniecki; Daniel H Solomon; Kurt P Spindler; John Wright; Rick W Wright; Elena Losina
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Medical decision making in patients with knee pain, meniscal tear, and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Lisa G Suter; Liana Fraenkel; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz; Andreas H Gomoll; A David Paltiel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-11-15

9.  Predictors of refusal during a multi-step recruitment process for a randomized controlled trial of arthritis education.

Authors:  Danielle C Blanch; Rima E Rudd; Elizabeth Wright; Victoria Gall; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-11

10.  Sham surgery trial controls: perspectives of patients and their relatives.

Authors:  Teresa L Swift
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.