OBJECTIVE: Randomized controlled trials in patient education often have difficulty enrolling vulnerable populations-specifically, older, poorer, and less educated individuals. We undertook a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an educational intervention for arthritis management, which included strategies to remove literacy-related barriers to participation. This paper reports on the multi-stage recruitment process and assesses whether refusal to participate was related to education, age, gender, working status, or insurance status. METHODS: The recruitment protocol was designed to eliminate literacy-related barriers to participation. Patients were never asked to read or fill out forms. Interactions were oral, using everyday terms and short, clear sentences. Patients who declined during a screening call were considered Stage 1 Refusers. Patients who initially expressed interest but neither completed a baseline questionnaire nor provided consent were considered Stage 2 Refusers. Patients who consented were considered Enrollees. Age, gender, and insurance status were compared between Stage 1 Refusers and Enrollees. A second analysis compared these variables, plus educational attainment and working status, between Stage 2 Refusers, and Enrollees. RESULTS: Of 408 eligible patients, there were 193 (47.3%) Stage 1 Refusers, 81 (19.9%) Stage 2 Refusers and 134 (32.8%) Enrollees. A higher proportion of Stage 1 Refusers than Enrollees were > or = 65 years old (58% vs. 37%, p = .0003). Multivariate analysis, adjusting for gender and insurance status, confirmed the effect of older age on refusal (OR = 2.3 (1.4, 3.6)). There were no significant differences between Stage 2 Refusers and Enrollees. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence of refusal to participate due to educational attainment, working status, insurance status, or gender. Older patients were more likely to refuse participation at the first stage of recruitment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Researchers should continue efforts to increase participation among older patients, particularly when studies are designed to be generalized to an elderly population as is the case with arthritis research. Strategies used in this recruitment protocol designed to remove literacy-related barriers to recruitment may be responsible for the observation that subjects with lower education did not have a higher rate of refusal. Such strategies deserve further study.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Randomized controlled trials in patient education often have difficulty enrolling vulnerable populations-specifically, older, poorer, and less educated individuals. We undertook a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an educational intervention for arthritis management, which included strategies to remove literacy-related barriers to participation. This paper reports on the multi-stage recruitment process and assesses whether refusal to participate was related to education, age, gender, working status, or insurance status. METHODS: The recruitment protocol was designed to eliminate literacy-related barriers to participation. Patients were never asked to read or fill out forms. Interactions were oral, using everyday terms and short, clear sentences. Patients who declined during a screening call were considered Stage 1 Refusers. Patients who initially expressed interest but neither completed a baseline questionnaire nor provided consent were considered Stage 2 Refusers. Patients who consented were considered Enrollees. Age, gender, and insurance status were compared between Stage 1 Refusers and Enrollees. A second analysis compared these variables, plus educational attainment and working status, between Stage 2 Refusers, and Enrollees. RESULTS: Of 408 eligible patients, there were 193 (47.3%) Stage 1 Refusers, 81 (19.9%) Stage 2 Refusers and 134 (32.8%) Enrollees. A higher proportion of Stage 1 Refusers than Enrollees were > or = 65 years old (58% vs. 37%, p = .0003). Multivariate analysis, adjusting for gender and insurance status, confirmed the effect of older age on refusal (OR = 2.3 (1.4, 3.6)). There were no significant differences between Stage 2 Refusers and Enrollees. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence of refusal to participate due to educational attainment, working status, insurance status, or gender. Older patients were more likely to refuse participation at the first stage of recruitment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Researchers should continue efforts to increase participation among older patients, particularly when studies are designed to be generalized to an elderly population as is the case with arthritis research. Strategies used in this recruitment protocol designed to remove literacy-related barriers to recruitment may be responsible for the observation that subjects with lower education did not have a higher rate of refusal. Such strategies deserve further study.
Authors: Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Kimber Richter; Matthew S Mayo; Harsohena K Ahluwalia; Won S Choi; Kristin H Schmelzle; Ken Resnicow Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Anjali S Advani; Benjamin Atkeson; Carrie L Brown; Bercedis L Peterson; Laura Fish; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jon P Gockerman; Marc Gautier Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Giselle Corbie-Smith; Catherine M Viscoli; Walter N Kernan; Lawrence M Brass; Philip Sarrel; Ralph I Horwitz Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Melissa Dattalo; Erin R Giovannetti; Daniel Scharfstein; Chad Boult; Stephen Wegener; Jennifer L Wolff; Bruce Leff; Kevin D Frick; Lisa Reider; Katherine Frey; Gary Noronha; Cynthia Boyd Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Rima E Rudd; Danielle C Blanch; Victoria Gall; Lori B Chibnik; Elizabeth A Wright; William Reichmann; Matthew H Liang; Jeffrey N Katz Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2009-04-03
Authors: Wendy Lowe; Claire Ballinger; Jo Protheroe; Jill Lueddeke; Don Nutbeam; Ray Armstrong; Louise Falzon; Chris Edwards; Cynthia Russell; Kirsten McCaffery; Jo Adams Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Kerstin A Kessel; Marco M E Vogel; Carmen Kessel; Henning Bier; Tilo Biedermann; Helmut Friess; Peter Herschbach; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Bernhard Meyer; Marion Kiechle; Ulrich Keller; Christian Peschel; Florian Bassermann; Roland Schmid; Markus Schwaiger; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-10-04