Literature DB >> 18715740

Predictors of refusal during a multi-step recruitment process for a randomized controlled trial of arthritis education.

Danielle C Blanch1, Rima E Rudd, Elizabeth Wright, Victoria Gall, Jeffrey N Katz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Randomized controlled trials in patient education often have difficulty enrolling vulnerable populations-specifically, older, poorer, and less educated individuals. We undertook a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an educational intervention for arthritis management, which included strategies to remove literacy-related barriers to participation. This paper reports on the multi-stage recruitment process and assesses whether refusal to participate was related to education, age, gender, working status, or insurance status.
METHODS: The recruitment protocol was designed to eliminate literacy-related barriers to participation. Patients were never asked to read or fill out forms. Interactions were oral, using everyday terms and short, clear sentences. Patients who declined during a screening call were considered Stage 1 Refusers. Patients who initially expressed interest but neither completed a baseline questionnaire nor provided consent were considered Stage 2 Refusers. Patients who consented were considered Enrollees. Age, gender, and insurance status were compared between Stage 1 Refusers and Enrollees. A second analysis compared these variables, plus educational attainment and working status, between Stage 2 Refusers, and Enrollees.
RESULTS: Of 408 eligible patients, there were 193 (47.3%) Stage 1 Refusers, 81 (19.9%) Stage 2 Refusers and 134 (32.8%) Enrollees. A higher proportion of Stage 1 Refusers than Enrollees were > or = 65 years old (58% vs. 37%, p = .0003). Multivariate analysis, adjusting for gender and insurance status, confirmed the effect of older age on refusal (OR = 2.3 (1.4, 3.6)). There were no significant differences between Stage 2 Refusers and Enrollees.
CONCLUSION: We found no evidence of refusal to participate due to educational attainment, working status, insurance status, or gender. Older patients were more likely to refuse participation at the first stage of recruitment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Researchers should continue efforts to increase participation among older patients, particularly when studies are designed to be generalized to an elderly population as is the case with arthritis research. Strategies used in this recruitment protocol designed to remove literacy-related barriers to recruitment may be responsible for the observation that subjects with lower education did not have a higher rate of refusal. Such strategies deserve further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18715740      PMCID: PMC3253015          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  36 in total

Review 1.  Is the randomized clinical trial the gold standard of research?

Authors:  S D Simon
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

2.  African American smokers interested and eligible for a smoking cessation clinical trial: predictors of not returning for randomization.

Authors:  Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Kimber Richter; Matthew S Mayo; Harsohena K Ahluwalia; Won S Choi; Kristin H Schmelzle; Ken Resnicow
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Who cares about recruitment anyway?

Authors:  Erika S Froelicher; Kate Lorig
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002 Oct -Nov

4.  Recruitment of rural community-dwelling older adults: barriers, challenges, and strategies.

Authors:  M C Dibartolo; S McCrone
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.658

5.  Barriers to the participation of African-American patients with cancer in clinical trials: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anjali S Advani; Benjamin Atkeson; Carrie L Brown; Bercedis L Peterson; Laura Fish; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jon P Gockerman; Marc Gautier
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Recruitment of subjects for clinical trials after informed consent: does gender and educational status make a difference?

Authors:  B Gitanjali; R Raveendran; D G Pandian; S Sujindra
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.476

7.  Illiteracy in rheumatoid arthritis patients as determined by the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) score.

Authors:  M-M Gordon; R Hampson; H A Capell; R Madhok
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Reporting the recruitment process in clinical trials: who are these patients and how did they get there?

Authors:  Cary P Gross; Raburn Mallory; Asefeh Heiat; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Influence of race, clinical, and other socio-demographic features on trial participation.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; Catherine M Viscoli; Walter N Kernan; Lawrence M Brass; Philip Sarrel; Ralph I Horwitz
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Characteristics of telephone survey respondents according to willingness to participate.

Authors:  Lynda F Voigt; Thomas D Koepsell; Janet R Daling
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  11 in total

1.  Predicting Participation in Psychiatric Randomized Controlled Trials: Insights From the STEP-BD.

Authors:  Alisa B Busch; Yulei He; Katya Zelevinsky; Alistair J O'Malley
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Who participates in chronic disease self-management (CDSM) programs? Differences between participants and nonparticipants in a population of multimorbid older adults.

Authors:  Melissa Dattalo; Erin R Giovannetti; Daniel Scharfstein; Chad Boult; Stephen Wegener; Jennifer L Wolff; Bruce Leff; Kevin D Frick; Lisa Reider; Katherine Frey; Gary Noronha; Cynthia Boyd
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  A randomized controlled trial of an intervention to reduce low literacy barriers in inflammatory arthritis management.

Authors:  Rima E Rudd; Danielle C Blanch; Victoria Gall; Lori B Chibnik; Elizabeth A Wright; William Reichmann; Matthew H Liang; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-04-03

4.  Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams.

Authors:  Lisa Newington; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  'It's trying to manage the work': a qualitative evaluation of recruitment processes within a UK multicentre trial.

Authors:  Zoë Christina Skea; Shaun Treweek; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The Feasibility of Health Trainer Improved Patient Self-Management in Patients with Low Health Literacy and Poorly Controlled Diabetes: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Joanne Protheroe; Trishna Rathod; Bernadette Bartlam; Gillian Rowlands; Gerry Richardson; David Reeves
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.011

7.  Exploring non-retention in clinical trials: a meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies reporting participant reasons for drop out.

Authors:  Zoë C Skea; Rumana Newlands; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Researchers' and clinicians' perceptions of recruiting participants to clinical research: a thematic meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Lisa Newington; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-03-31

Review 9.  Effectiveness of musculoskeletal education interventions in people with low literacy levels: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wendy Lowe; Claire Ballinger; Jo Protheroe; Jill Lueddeke; Don Nutbeam; Ray Armstrong; Louise Falzon; Chris Edwards; Cynthia Russell; Kirsten McCaffery; Jo Adams
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  Cancer clinical trials - Survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC).

Authors:  Kerstin A Kessel; Marco M E Vogel; Carmen Kessel; Henning Bier; Tilo Biedermann; Helmut Friess; Peter Herschbach; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Bernhard Meyer; Marion Kiechle; Ulrich Keller; Christian Peschel; Florian Bassermann; Roland Schmid; Markus Schwaiger; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.