Literature DB >> 15837410

Triphasic MRI of pelvic organ descent: sources of measurement error.

Geert L Morren1, Adrian G Balasingam, J Elisabeth Wells, Anne M Hunter, Richard H Coates, Richard E Perry.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify sources of error when measuring pelvic organ displacement during straining using triphasic dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy nulliparous woman underwent triphasic dynamic 1.5 T pelvic MRI twice with 1 week between studies. The bladder was filled with 200 ml of a saline solution, the vagina and rectum were opacified with ultrasound gel. T2 weighted images in the sagittal plane were analysed twice by each of the two observers in a blinded fashion. Horizontal and vertical displacement of the bladder neck, bladder base, introitus vaginae, posterior fornix, cul-de sac, pouch of Douglas, anterior rectal wall, anorectal junction and change of the vaginal axis were measured eight times in each volunteer (two images, each read twice by two observers). Variance components were calculated for subject, observer, week, interactions of these three factors, and pure error. An overall standard error of measurement was calculated for a single observation by one observer on a film from one woman at one visit.
RESULTS: For the majority of anatomical reference points, the range of displacements measured was wide and the overall measurement error was large. Intra-observer error and week-to-week variation within a subject were important sources of measurement error.
CONCLUSION: Important sources of measurement error when using triphasic dynamic MRI to measure pelvic organ displacement during straining were identified. Recommendations to minimize those errors are made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15837410     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  11 in total

1.  POP-Q, dynamic MR imaging, and perineal ultrasonography: do they agree in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Kirsten B Kluivers; Jan C M Hendriks; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-02-17

2.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: reliability of anatomical landmarks and reference lines used to assess pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Kirsten B Kluivers; Jan C M Hendriks; Mark E Vierhout; Jelle O Barentsz; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-11-11

3.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging before and 6 months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Robin M F van der Weiden; Elena Rociu; Guido H H Mannaerts; Marcel H A van Hooff; Mark E Vierhout; Mariella I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Reproducibility of dynamic MR imaging pelvic measurements: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Mark E Lockhart; Julia R Fielding; Holly E Richter; Linda Brubaker; Caryl G Salomon; Wen Ye; Christiane M Hakim; Clifford Y Wai; Alan H Stolpen; Anne M Weber
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Measurement error in using whole-body multi-slice MRI should be acknowledged when quantifying changes in organ size after a weight-loss intervention.

Authors:  Ru Wang; Peijie Chen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Comparison of measurement systems for posterior vaginal wall prolapse on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bing Xie; Luyun Chen; Zhuowei Xue; Emily M English; Dee E Fenner; Kara Gaetke-Udager; Giselle E Kolenic; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Normal values for assessment of anal sphincter morphology, anorectal motion, and pelvic organ prolapse with MRI in healthy women.

Authors:  P Tirumanisetty; D Prichard; J G Fletcher; S Chakraborty; A R Zinsmeister; A E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Relevance of open magnetic resonance imaging position (sitting and standing) to quantify pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Marwa Abdulaziz; Alex Kavanagh; Lynn Stothers; Andrew J Macnab
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  [Functional MRI of the pelvic floor].

Authors:  Céline D Alt
Journal:  Radiologie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-05-20

10.  The establishment of a 3D anatomical coordinate system for defining vaginal axis and spatial position.

Authors:  Deanna C E Sinex; Shaniel T Bowen; Ahmed Kashkoush; Arianna Rosemond; Danielle Carter; Prahlad G Menon; Pamela A Moalli; Steven D Abramowitch
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 7.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.