Literature DB >> 15837046

Prediction of gastric cancer lymph node status by sentinel lymph node biopsy and the Maruyama computer model.

S Gretschel1, A Bembenek, Ch Ulmer, M Hünerbein, J Markwardt, U Schneider, P M Schlag.   

Abstract

AIMS: The extent of lymph node dissection in gastric cancer remains controversial. The Maruyama computer model and the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are compared for their value to predict the nodal status and lead to stage-adapted surgery.
METHODS: Thirty four patients with stage I-IV gastric cancer underwent both staging procedures. For SLNB, 15 patients underwent endoscopic, peri-tumoural injection of (99m)Tc-colloid, and 19 patients were injected of Patent blue V. All 'hot' or blue sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were separately excised and histopathologically assessed. If the SLN was negative after routine staining by H&E, it was processed completely and reanalysed after immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: At least, one SLN was detected by means of SLNB in 33/34 of the patients. The sensitivity to identify a positive nodal status was 22/33 and the specificity/positive predictive value was 10/10 and 22/22. Additional micrometastases or isolated tumour cells in the SLN led to 'upstaging' of 5/15, initially classified as nodal negative by H&E-staining. Using the Maruyama computer model, a sensitivity of 22/23 for the correct prediction of the lymph node involvement was associated with a specificity of 2/10 and a positive predictive value of 22/30.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical impact of the Maruyama computer model is limited due to low specificity and a low positive predictive value, rendering the method less useful as an indicator for individualised surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15837046     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  16 in total

Review 1.  What is the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy for gastric cancer? A systematic review.

Authors:  Roberta Cardoso; Alina Bocicariu; Matthew Dixon; Lavanya Yohanathan; Rajini Seevaratnam; Lucy Helyer; Calvin Law; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for gastric cancer: Where do we stand?

Authors:  Mehmet Fatih Can; Gokhan Yagci; Sadettin Cetiner
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-27

3.  Prospective, comparative study for the evaluation of lymph node involvement in gastric cancer: Maruyama computer program versus sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Dezső Tóth; Miklós Török; Zsolt Kincses; László Damjanovich
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  [Minimal residual tumor in gastrointestinal carcinoma. Relevance to prognosis and oncologic surgical consequences].

Authors:  S Gretschel; A Bembenek; T Schulze; W Kemmner; P M Schlag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Sentinel node navigation surgery for gastric cancer: Overview and perspective.

Authors:  Masakazu Yashiro; Tasuku Matsuoka
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-01-27

Review 6.  Sentinel node navigation surgery in gastric cancer: Current status.

Authors:  Dimitrios Symeonidis; George Koukoulis; Konstantinos Tepetes
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06-27

Review 7.  Clinical significance of lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Dezső Tóth; János Plósz; Miklós Török
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 8.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Gastric Cancer, an Optimization of Imaging Protocol for Tracer Mapping.

Authors:  Yuqiang Huang; Mengting Pan; Bo Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  PTD classification: proposal for a new classification of gastric cancer location based on physiological lymphatic flow.

Authors:  Shinichi Kinami; Takashi Fujimura; Eisuke Ojima; Sachio Fushida; Toshihiko Ojima; Hiroshi Funaki; Hideto Fujita; Hiroyuki Takamura; Itasu Ninomiya; Genichi Nishimura; Masato Kayahara; Tetsuo Ohta; Zen Yoh
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.