Literature DB >> 15837009

Ballistic skin simulant.

Jorma Jussila1, Ari Leppäniemi, Mikael Paronen, Erkki Kulomäki.   

Abstract

Hydrogels prepared from water solutions containing 10-20 mass% gelatine are generally accepted muscle tissue simulants in terminal ballistic research. They, however, do not have a surface layer which simulates the effect of human skin. The purpose of this research was to find a suitable skin simulant for enhancing the testing fidelity and the credibility of the results with gelatine-based materials when assessing the injury potential of not only high energy bullets, but also especially that of non-penetrating "less lethal" kinetic impact ammunition and relatively low energy ricochet fragments. A skin simulant also permits the simulation and assessment of exit wounds. The mechanical and ballistic properties of human skin and target simulant were established on the basis of results found in the literature. Some errors in these were found. The corrected values are included in this paper for comparison. The target values of the mechanical properties of the skin simulant were the following: threshold velocity v(th)=94+/-4 m/s, tensile strength 18+/-2 N/mm2 and elongation at break 65+/-5%. A selection of synthetic and natural materials was evaluated as skin simulants by analysing their mechanical and ballistic properties. The results were compared to literature values obtained with human cadavers. The tests showed that the best skin simulant of the ones evaluated was semi-finished chrome tanned upholstery "crust" cowhide of 0.9-1.1 mm nominal thickness. Its threshold velocity was 90.7 m/s, tensile strength 20.89+/-4.11 MPa and elongation at break 61+/-9%. These values are the same as the average values of human skin. Of the synthetic materials evaluated, 1mm thick natural rubber can be used on impact side as a threshold velocity filter with some reservations although its theoretical threshold velocity is only 82.9 m/s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15837009     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  14 in total

1.  A study considering the force required for broken glass bottles to penetrate a skin simulant.

Authors:  Gary Nolan; Simon Lawes; Sarah Hainsworth; Guy Rutty
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Movement of steel-jacketed projectiles in biological tissue in the magnetic field of a 3-T magnetic resonance unit.

Authors:  Stephan A Bolliger; Michael J Thali; Dominic Gascho; Sebastian A Poschmann; Sebastian Eggert
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Development of a shoulder-mounted robot for MRI-guided needle placement: phantom study.

Authors:  Reza Monfaredi; Iulian Iordachita; Emmanuel Wilson; Raymond Sze; Karun Sharma; Axel Krieger; Stanley Fricke; Kevin Cleary
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Validation of Roebuck 1518 synthetic chamois as a skin simulant when backed by 10% gelatin.

Authors:  Amy Pullen; David C Kieser; Gary Hooper
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Investigation of dental materials as skin simulants for forensic skin/skull/brain model impact testing.

Authors:  Lisa Falland-Cheung; Nicholas Pittar; Darryl Tong; J Neil Waddell
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Quantification of forces required for stabbing with screwdrivers and other blunter instruments.

Authors:  Kiran Parmar; Sarah Victoria Hainsworth; Guy Nathan Rutty
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Human-Robot Collaboration Dynamic Impact Testing and Calibration Instrument for Disposable Robot Safety Artifacts.

Authors:  Nicholas G Dagalakis; Jae Myung Yoo; Thomas Oeste
Journal:  Ind Rob       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.352

8.  Designing the ideal model for assessment of wound contamination after gunshot injuries: a comparative experimental study.

Authors:  Constantin von See; Majeed Rana; Marcus Stoetzer; Horst Kokemueller; Martin Ruecker; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Comparison of Spinal Needle Deflection in a Ballistic Gel Model.

Authors:  Ethan Rand; George Christolias; Christopher Visco; Jaspal R Singh
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-05-30

Review 10.  Ten years of molecular ballistics-a review and a field guide.

Authors:  Jan Euteneuer; Cornelius Courts
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.