Literature DB >> 15836229

The melting temperature of the most common models of water.

C Vega1, E Sanz, J L F Abascal.   

Abstract

The melting temperature of ice I(h) for several commonly used models of water (SPC, SPC/E,TIP3P,TIP4P, TIP4P/Ew, and TIP5P) is obtained from computer simulations at p = 1 bar. Since the melting temperature of ice I(h) for the TIP4P model is now known [E. Sanz, C. Vega, J. L. F. Abascal, and L. G. MacDowell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 255701 (2004)], it is possible to use the Gibbs-Duhem methodology [D. Kofke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 4149 (1993)] to evaluate the melting temperature of ice I(h) for other potential models of water. We have found that the melting temperatures of ice I(h) for SPC, SPC/E, TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP4P/Ew, and TIP5P models are T = 190 K, 215 K, 146 K, 232 K, 245 K, and 274 K, respectively. The relative stability of ice I(h) with respect to ice II for these models has also been considered. It turns out that for SPC, SPC/E, TIP3P, and TIP5P the stable phase at the normal melting point is ice II (so that ice I(h) is not a thermodynamically stable phase for these models). For TIP4P and TIP4P/Ew, ice I(h) is the stable solid phase at the standard melting point. The location of the negative charge along the H-O-H bisector appears as a critical factor in the determination of the relative stability between the I(h) and II ice forms. The methodology proposed in this paper can be used to investigate the effect upon a coexistence line due to a change in the potential parameters.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 15836229     DOI: 10.1063/1.1862245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  15 in total

1.  Defect pair separation as the controlling step in homogeneous ice melting.

Authors:  Kenji Mochizuki; Masakazu Matsumoto; Iwao Ohmine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Structural Relaxation Processes and Collective Dynamics of Water in Biomolecular Environments.

Authors:  Sara Capponi; Stephen H White; Douglas J Tobias; Matthias Heyden
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Proton storage site in bacteriorhodopsin: new insights from quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics simulations of microscopic pK(a) and infrared spectra.

Authors:  Puja Goyal; Nilanjan Ghosh; Prasad Phatak; Maike Clemens; Michael Gaus; Marcus Elstner; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  Molecular dynamics of water in the neighborhood of aquaporins.

Authors:  Marcelo Ozu; H Ariel Alvarez; Andrés N McCarthy; J Raúl Grigera; Osvaldo Chara
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Liquid-liquid transition in supercooled water suggested by microsecond simulations.

Authors:  Yaping Li; Jicun Li; Feng Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The biological function of an insect antifreeze protein simulated by molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Michael J Kuiper; Craig J Morton; Sneha E Abraham; Angus Gray-Weale
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Multipolar Ewald methods, 2: applications using a quantum mechanical force field.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Maria T Panteva; Haoyuan Chen; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Ice-nucleating bacteria control the order and dynamics of interfacial water.

Authors:  Ravindra Pandey; Kota Usui; Ruth A Livingstone; Sean A Fischer; Jim Pfaendtner; Ellen H G Backus; Yuki Nagata; Janine Fröhlich-Nowoisky; Lars Schmüser; Sergio Mauri; Jan F Scheel; Daniel A Knopf; Ulrich Pöschl; Mischa Bonn; Tobias Weidner
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Further along the Road Less Traveled: AMBER ff15ipq, an Original Protein Force Field Built on a Self-Consistent Physical Model.

Authors:  Karl T Debiec; David S Cerutti; Lewis R Baker; Angela M Gronenborn; David A Case; Lillian T Chong
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  A computational approach to calculate the heat of transport of aqueous solutions.

Authors:  Silvia Di Lecce; Tim Albrecht; Fernando Bresme
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.