Literature DB >> 15833979

Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging.

Fumiyuki Yamasaki1, Kaoru Kurisu, Kenichi Satoh, Kazunori Arita, Kazuhiko Sugiyama, Megu Ohtaki, Junko Takaba, Atushi Tominaga, Ryosuke Hanaya, Hiroyuki Yoshioka, Seiji Hama, Yoko Ito, Yoshinori Kajiwara, Kaita Yahara, Taiichi Saito, Muhamad A Thohar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to differentiate brain tumors at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval or informed patient consent was not required. MR images were reviewed retrospectively in 275 patients with brain tumors: 147 males and 128 females 1-81 years old, treated between September 1997 and July 2003. Regions of interest were placed manually in tumor regions on MR images, and ADC was calculated with a five-point regression method at b values of 0, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 sec/mm2. ADC values were average values in tumor. All brain tumor subgroups were analyzed. Logistic discriminant analysis was performed by using ADC, age, and patient sex as independent variables to discriminate among tumor groups.
RESULTS: A significant negative correlation existed between ADC and astrocytic tumors of World Health Organization grades 2-4 (grade 2 vs grades 3 and 4, accuracy of 91.3% [P < .01]; grade 3 vs 4, accuracy of 82.4% [P < .01]). ADC of dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors (DNTs) was higher than that of astrocytic grade 2 tumors (accuracy, 100%) and other glioneuronal tumors. ADC of malignant lymphomas was lower than that of glioblastomas and metastatic tumors (accuracy, 83.6%; P < .01). ADC of primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) was lower than that of ependymomas (accuracy, 100%). ADC of meningiomas was lower than that of schwannomas (accuracy, 92.4%; P < .01). ADC of craniopharyngiomas was higher than that of pituitary adenomas (accuracy, 85.2%; P < .05). ADC of epidermoid tumors was lower than that of chordomas (accuracy, 100%). In meningiomas, ADC was not indicative of malignancy grade or histologic subtype.
CONCLUSION: ADC is useful for differentiation of some human brain tumors, particularly DNT, malignant lymphomas versus glioblastomas and metastatic tumors, and ependymomas versus PNETs. Copyright RSNA, 2005.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15833979     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2353031338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  147 in total

1.  Value and limitations of diffusion-weighted imaging in grading and diagnosis of pediatric posterior fossa tumors.

Authors:  J L Jaremko; L B O Jans; L T Coleman; M R Ditchfield
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Relation of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 proliferation index in meningiomas.

Authors:  Ozdil Baskan; Gokalp Silav; Fatih Han Bolukbasi; Ozlem Canoz; Serdar Geyik; Ilhan Elmaci
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphomas from high-grade gliomas by rCBV and percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging.

Authors:  Z Xing; R X You; J Li; Y Liu; D R Cao
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Multiparametric 3T MR approach to the assessment of cerebral gliomas: tumor extent and malignancy.

Authors:  Alfonso Di Costanzo; Tommaso Scarabino; Francesca Trojsi; Giuseppe M Giannatempo; Teresa Popolizio; Domenico Catapano; Simona Bonavita; Nicola Maggialetti; Michela Tosetti; Ugo Salvolini; Vincenzo A d'Angelo; Giocchino Tedeschi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  MR Imaging-Based Analysis of Glioblastoma Multiforme: Estimation of IDH1 Mutation Status.

Authors:  K Yamashita; A Hiwatashi; O Togao; K Kikuchi; R Hatae; K Yoshimoto; M Mizoguchi; S O Suzuki; T Yoshiura; H Honda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Imaging and diagnostic advances for intracranial meningiomas.

Authors:  Raymond Y Huang; Wenya Linda Bi; Brent Griffith; Timothy J Kaufmann; Christian la Fougère; Nils Ole Schmidt; Jöerg C Tonn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Patrick Y Wen; Kenneth Aldape; Farshad Nassiri; Gelareh Zadeh; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Neuroimaging diagnosis of pineal region tumors-quest for pathognomonic finding of germinoma.

Authors:  Ryuji Awa; Francia Campos; Kazunori Arita; Kazuhiko Sugiyama; Atsushi Tominaga; Kaoru Kurisu; Fumiyuki Yamasaki; Prasanna Karki; Hiroshi Tokimura; Yoshihiko Fukukura; Yukihiko Fujii; Ryosuke Hanaya; Tatsuki Oyoshi; Hirofumi Hirano
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  An acetone-based phantom for quantitative diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Xiaoke Wang; Scott B Reeder; Diego Hernando
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Roles of the apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor volume in predicting tumor grade in patients with choroid plexus tumors.

Authors:  Tomoaki Sasaki; John Kim; Toshio Moritani; Aristides A Capizzano; Shawn P Sato; Yutaka Sato; Patricia Kirby; Shunta Ishitoya; Akiko Oya; Masahiro Toda; Sayaka Yuzawa; Koji Takahashi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Sumei Wang; Sungheon Kim; Sanjeev Chawla; Ronald L Wolf; Wei-Guo Zhang; Donald M O'Rourke; Kevin D Judy; Elias R Melhem; Harish Poptani
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.