Literature DB >> 26537690

Relation of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 proliferation index in meningiomas.

Ozdil Baskan1, Gokalp Silav2, Fatih Han Bolukbasi2, Ozlem Canoz3, Serdar Geyik1, Ilhan Elmaci2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between Ki-67 proliferation indexes and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of low-grade and atypical/anaplastic (high-grade) meningiomas.
METHODS: Pre-operative diffusion-weighted imaging and histopathological evaluation of 44 patients with meningiomas were performed retrospectively. Regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn on the ADC images. In total six ROI measurements were taken in three consecutive slices, and the average of the mean ADC value was used. The relationship between the ADC and Ki-67 values was investigated, and the ADC values of the low-grade and high-grade meningiomas were compared.
RESULTS: 31 (70%) patients had low-grade the meningiomas. 10 (23%) patients had atypical and 3 (7%) had anaplastic meningiomas. ADC values of the low-grade and high-grade meningiomas were 0.81 ± 0.12 × 10(-3) and 0.66 ± 0.08 × 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1), respectively. Ki-67 proliferation indexes were 2.19% ± 1.14% for low-grade and 11.20% ± 9.80% for high-grade meningiomas. A statistically significant negative correlation between Ki-67 proliferation index and ADC values of the low-grade and high-grade meningiomas was detected (r(2) = 0.326, p < 0.001). High-grade meningiomas had lower ADC values than that of low-grade meningiomas. There was statistically significant difference between the ADC values of the low-grade and high-grade meningiomas (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our data provide an inverse correlation between the ADC and Ki-67 proliferation index values of meningiomas. ADC values can be used for histopathological characterization of the meningiomas and pre-surgical planning. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between Ki-67 proliferation indexes and ADC values of low-grade and atypical/anaplastic (high-grade) meningiomas. In addition, we compared the ADC and Ki-67 proliferative index values of the low-grade and atypical/anaplastic (high-grade) meningiomas. We concluded that there was an inverse correlation between the ADC and Ki-67 proliferation index values in meningiomas, and we have found statistically significant difference between the ADC values of the low-grade and high-grade meningiomas. ADC values can be used for histopathological characterization of the meningiomas and pre-surgical planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26537690      PMCID: PMC4985940          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  22 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging does not predict histological grading in meningiomas.

Authors:  Luca Santelli; Gaetano Ramondo; Alessandro Della Puppa; Mario Ermani; Renato Scienza; Domenico d'Avella; Renzo Manara
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  WHO grade II and III meningiomas: a study of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Anne Durand; François Labrousse; Anne Jouvet; Luc Bauchet; Michel Kalamaridès; Philippe Menei; Robert Deruty; Jean Jacques Moreau; Michelle Fèvre-Montange; Jacques Guyotat
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005-2009.

Authors:  Therese A Dolecek; Jennifer M Propp; Nancy E Stroup; Carol Kruchko
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 proliferation index in grading meningioma.

Authors:  Yi Tang; Sathish K Dundamadappa; Senthur Thangasamy; Thomas Flood; Richard Moser; Thomas Smith; Keith Cauley; Deepak Takhtani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to distinguishing typical from atypical meningiomas.

Authors:  Bahattin Hakyemez; Nalan Yildirim; Gokhan Gokalp; Cuneyt Erdogan; Mufit Parlak
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Prognostic significance of Ki-67/MIB-1 proliferation index in meningiomas.

Authors:  S H Torp; C F Lindboe; B H Grønberg; S Lydersen; S Sundstrøm
Journal:  Clin Neuropathol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.368

7.  Histopathological classification and location of consecutively operated meningiomas at a single institution in China from 2001 to 2010.

Authors:  Dai-jun Wang; Qing Xie; Ye Gong; Ying Mao; Yin Wang; Hai-xia Cheng; Ping Zhong; Xiao-ming Che; Cheng-chuan Jiang; Feng-ping Huang; Kang Zheng; Shi-qi Li; Yu-xiang Gu; Wei-min Bao; Bo-jie Yang; Jing-song Wu; Li-qian Xie; Ming-zhe Zheng; Hai-liang Tang; Hong-da Zhu; Xian-cheng Chen; Liang-fu Zhou
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnosing atypical or malignant meningiomas and detecting tumor dedifferentiation.

Authors:  V A Nagar; J R Ye; W H Ng; Y H Chan; F Hui; C K Lee; C C T Lim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Preoperative histological grading of meningiomas using apparent diffusion coefficient at 3T MRI.

Authors:  Yosuke Watanabe; Fumiyuki Yamasaki; Yoshinori Kajiwara; Takeshi Takayasu; Ryo Nosaka; Yuji Akiyama; Kazuhiko Sugiyama; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 10.  Diffusion-weighted MRI as a biomarker for treatment response in glioma.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2012-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  The diagnostic value of using combined MR diffusion tensor imaging parameters to differentiate between low- and high-grade meningioma.

Authors:  Kerim Aslan; Hediye Pinar Gunbey; Leman Tomak; Lutfi Incesu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Associations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and KI 67 in different tumors: a meta-analysis. Part 1: ADCmean.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Hans Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-24

Review 3.  Meningioma: A Review of Clinicopathological and Molecular Aspects.

Authors:  Kristin Huntoon; Angus Martin Shaw Toland; Sonika Dahiya
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Preoperative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values for Differentiation between Low and High Grade Meningiomas: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yueh-Ting Tsai; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Yun-Ju Shih; Sher-Wei Lim; Cheng-Chun Yang; Yu-Ting Kuo; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ching-Chung Ko
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.