OBJECTIVE: To identify within primary care in Scotland how far procedures for asthma review and patient education match guideline recommendations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Telephone survey of a one in four stratified random sample of all 1058 general practices in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Practice nurses, general practitioners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of practices matching guideline recommendations for asthma review, targeting of care, use of structured asthma records, provision of management plans, education, and regular audit. RESULTS: Of 276 general practices contacted 91% (251) completed the questionnaire; 93% (228) ran an asthma review service; 74% (166) employed a specially trained asthma nurse; 39% (106) had a policy for providing action plans; 63% (155) had carried out an asthma audit in the previous 3 years; 76% (218) used a structured tool in consultations, 46% with use of computer technology, 34% used only a manual stamp. Sixty-six per cent (173) had searched for patients overusing beta2 agonists; 32% (79) had searched for patients on medication treatment step 3 and above. Single- or two-partner practices were less likely to follow guideline recommendations but neither rurality nor deprivation was related to guideline compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Three-quarters of Scottish general practices have trained asthma nurses and offer patients asthma review, but only a minority have proactive care procedures for targeting patients or a policy for providing patients with action plans. Practice systems are underused for identifying 'at-risk' patients. There is a need for proactive procedures and provision of self-management materials to patients. Access to trained asthma nurses needs to be improved.
OBJECTIVE: To identify within primary care in Scotland how far procedures for asthma review and patient education match guideline recommendations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Telephone survey of a one in four stratified random sample of all 1058 general practices in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Practice nurses, general practitioners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of practices matching guideline recommendations for asthma review, targeting of care, use of structured asthma records, provision of management plans, education, and regular audit. RESULTS: Of 276 general practices contacted 91% (251) completed the questionnaire; 93% (228) ran an asthma review service; 74% (166) employed a specially trained asthma nurse; 39% (106) had a policy for providing action plans; 63% (155) had carried out an asthma audit in the previous 3 years; 76% (218) used a structured tool in consultations, 46% with use of computer technology, 34% used only a manual stamp. Sixty-six per cent (173) had searched for patients overusing beta2 agonists; 32% (79) had searched for patients on medication treatment step 3 and above. Single- or two-partner practices were less likely to follow guideline recommendations but neither rurality nor deprivation was related to guideline compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Three-quarters of Scottish general practices have trained asthma nurses and offer patients asthma review, but only a minority have proactive care procedures for targeting patients or a policy for providing patients with action plans. Practice systems are underused for identifying 'at-risk' patients. There is a need for proactive procedures and provision of self-management materials to patients. Access to trained asthma nurses needs to be improved.
Authors: Johanna L van Gaalen; Thijs Beerthuizen; Victor van der Meer; Patricia van Reisen; Geertje W Redelijkheid; Jiska B Snoeck-Stroband; Jacob K Sont Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Gaylor Hoskins; Brian Williams; Purva Abhyankar; Peter Donnan; Edward Duncan; Hilary Pinnock; Marjon van der Pol; Petra Rauchhaus; Anne Taylor; Aziz Sheikh Journal: Trials Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Johanna L van Gaalen; Moira J Bakker; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Jiska B Snoeck-Stroband; Willem J J Assendelft; Ad A Kaptein; Victor van der Meer; Christian Taube; Bart P Thoonen; Jacob K Sont Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Deborah Morrison; Frances S Mair; Rekha Chaudhuri; Marilyn McGee-Lennon; Mike Thomas; Neil C Thomson; Lucy Yardley; Sally Wyke Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Deborah Morrison; Sally Wyke; Karolina Agur; Euan J Cameron; Robert I Docking; Alison M Mackenzie; Alex McConnachie; Vandana Raghuvir; Neil C Thomson; Frances S Mair Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Gaylor Hoskins; Purva Abhyankar; Anne D Taylor; Edward Duncan; Aziz Sheikh; Hilary Pinnock; Marjon van der Pol; Peter T Donnan; Brian Williams Journal: Trials Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 2.279