Literature DB >> 15830480

Susceptibility of clinical isolates of bacteria to cefoxitin and cephalothin.

R C Moellering, M Dray, L J Kunz.   

Abstract

The susceptibility of 4,929 unselected clinical isolates of bacteria to cefoxitin and cephalothin was determined by the single-disk method, using a computer-associated electronic zone analyzer to obtain, record, and process measurements of sizes of zones of inhibition. Both cefoxitin and cephalothin were effective against most gram-positive strains, including Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, micrococci, and all streptococci except enterococci. The three strains of Listeria monocytogenes tested were susceptible to cephalothin but resistant to cefoxitin. There was little difference between the cefoxitin and cephalothin susceptibility of Salmonellae, Citrobacter sp., Enterobacter sp., Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas sp. Cefoxitin was more effective then cephalothin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp., Serratia sp., indole-positive Proteus sp., Providence sp., Flavobacter sp., Herellea vaginicola, and Mima polymorpha. Cefoxitin also appeared to exhibit enhanced activity, as compared with cephalothin, against Bacteroides sp. Thus cefoxitin appears to have a very broad antibacterial spectrum which is greater than that of cephalothin, especially against gram-negative strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1974        PMID: 15830480      PMCID: PMC444644          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.6.3.320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  9 in total

1.  Computer-generated plots of results of antimicrobial-susceptibility tests.

Authors:  T F O'Brien; R L Kent; A A Medeiros
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1969-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis to six antibiotics determined by standardized antimicrobial disc susceptibility testing.

Authors:  V L Sutter; Y Kwok; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  An in vivo comparison of cefoxitin, a semi-synthetic cephamycin, with cephalothin.

Authors:  J M Hamilton-Miller; D W Kerry; W Brumfitt
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Evaluation of a computer-associated electronic zone analyzer in single-disc antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  R C Moellering; B A Mercier; L J Kunz; J W Poitras
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Mechanical method of inoculating plates for antibiotic sensitivity testing.

Authors:  L J Kunz; R C Moellering
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-09

7.  Cefoxitin, a semisynthetic cephamycin antibiotic: susceptibility studies.

Authors:  H Wallick; D Hendlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Standardized antimicrobial disc susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. I. Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis to tetracycline.

Authors:  V L Sutter; Y Y Kwok; S M Finegold
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-02

9.  Cefoxitin, a semisynthetic cephamycin antibiotic: resistance to beta-lactamase inactivation.

Authors:  H R Onishi; D R Daoust; S B Zimmerman; D Hendlin; E O Stapley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 5.191

  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Comparative clinical pharmacology of intravenous cefoxitin and cephalothin.

Authors:  P F Sonneville; R R Kartodirdjo; H Skeggs; A E Till; C M Martin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1976-03-22       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to cofoxitin and related compounds.

Authors:  V T Bach; I Roy; H Thadepalli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Antibacterial activity of selected beta-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics against cephalothin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  R P Lewis; R D Meyer; L L Kraus
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro comparison of cefoxitin, cefamandole, cephalexin, and cephalothin.

Authors:  T C Eickhoff; J M Ehret
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Cephamycins: a review, prospects and some original observations.

Authors:  J M Hamilton-Miller; W Brumfitt
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 6.  The third generation cephalosporins.

Authors:  B Farber; R C Moellering
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1982-11

7.  Comparative study of the in vitro antibacterial activity of cefoxitin, cefuroxine, and cephaloridine.

Authors:  R Norrby; J E Brorsson; S Seeberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Effect of lidocaine on the absorption, disposition and tolerance of intramuscularly administered cefoxitin.

Authors:  P F Sonneville; K S Albert; H Skeggs; H Gentner; K C Kwan; C M Martin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1977-12-02       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Comparison of the antibacterial activity of nine cephalosporins against Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  L Verbist
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Cefoxitin: a review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  R N Brogden; R C Heel; T M Speight; G S Avery
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.